Re: [U-Boot] debugX macro

2011-10-25 Thread Marek Vasut
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > > > In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > >> I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used > >> only in very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hu

Re: [U-Boot] debugX macro

2011-10-25 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: >> >> I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used >> only in >> very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hurt. >>

Re: [U-Boot] debugX macro

2011-10-23 Thread Marek Vasut
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 07:23:26 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used > > only in very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hurt. >

Re: [U-Boot] debugX macro

2011-10-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used only > in > very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hurt. > > The following do use it: > ./board/spc1920/hpi.c > ./drivers

[U-Boot] debugX macro

2011-10-23 Thread Marek Vasut
Hi, I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used only in very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hurt. The following do use it: ./board/spc1920/hpi.c ./drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410_nand.c Opinions? Thanks, Cheers! ___