Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nathan Sidwell, In message <4d0718d5.2050...@codesourcery.com> you wrote: > > >> It is required by the C and C++ standards. > > > > Could you please provide a link? Not that I don't believe you, but > > I'd like to understand the rationale, if there is any. > > C std 6.10.1 para 2 Hm... wh

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-13 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 12/13/10 21:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Nathan, > > In message<4d066e11.9000...@codesourcery.com> you wrote: >> >>> Hopefully, Nathan can provide some input on this. >> >> It is required by the C and C++ standards. > > Could you please provide a link? Not that I don't believe you, but > I'

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-13 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nathan, In message <4d066e11.9000...@codesourcery.com> you wrote: > > > Hopefully, Nathan can provide some input on this. > > It is required by the C and C++ standards. Could you please provide a link? Not that I don't believe you, but I'd like to understand the rationale, if there is any

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-13 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 12/13/10 18:47, Kumar Gala wrote: > Hopefully, Nathan can provide some input on this. It is required by the C and C++ standards. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell:: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-13 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 13, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message you > wrote: >> >>> Or has the rule officially been dropped that the "#if" in the C >>> prepro use the same shortcut logic as the "if" in C? >> >> I'm being told that not reporting this as an error is a bug

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-13 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > > > Or has the rule officially been dropped that the "#if" in the C > > prepro use the same shortcut logic as the "if" in C? > > I'm being told that not reporting this as an error is a bug in previous > gcc's not the new one. There isn't anything in the

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-13 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 12, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <20101210122714.24b2c...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:14:43 -0600 >> Kumar Gala wrote: >> >>> On the OXC & RMU boards I'm seeing the following build error: >>> >>> powerp

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message <20101210122714.24b2c...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:14:43 -0600 > Kumar Gala wrote: > > > On the OXC & RMU boards I'm seeing the following build error: > > > > powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -g -Os -mrelocatable -ffunction-sections

Re: [U-Boot] compile errors with gcc-4.5.1 on OXC and RMU boards

2010-12-10 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:14:43 -0600 Kumar Gala wrote: > On the OXC & RMU boards I'm seeing the following build error: > > powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -g -Os -mrelocatable -ffunction-sections > -fdata-sections -fPIC -meabi -D__KERNEL__ -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFFF0 > -I/local/home/galak/git/u-