Re: [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Trimarchi
hi On 02/10/2011 05:24 PM, Andy Pont wrote: > Michael wrote... > >>> If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U- Boot > is >>> it something that would be a worthwhile addition? >> >> I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual > mapping >> and

Re: [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support

2011-02-10 Thread Andy Pont
Michael wrote... > > If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U- Boot is > > it something that would be a worthwhile addition? > > I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual mapping > and parameter passing Are you prepared to share them and I

Re: [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support

2011-02-10 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi, On 02/10/2011 03:26 PM, Andy Pont wrote: > Graeme wrote... > >>> Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or > did >>> they never make it into the mainline code? >>> >> >> I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the > one >> with 'obnoxi

Re: [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support

2011-02-10 Thread Andy Pont
Graeme wrote... > > Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or did > > they never make it into the mainline code? > > > > I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the one > with 'obnoxious advertising' clause) probably didn't help ;) If the

Re: [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support

2011-02-10 Thread Graeme Russ
On 10/02/11 21:13, Andy Pont wrote: > Hello! > > Does anyone know what happened to the patches for loading and booting > Windows CE image suggested here: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-August/039202.html > > Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or

[U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support

2011-02-10 Thread Andy Pont
Hello! Does anyone know what happened to the patches for loading and booting Windows CE image suggested here: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-August/039202.html Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or did they never make it into the mainline code? Than