On Feb 8, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 10:44:30 AM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
> This should go inside the "not raw" path of the previous "if" statement.
> Please use tabs to indent.
> We already have "nand" in this context.
> We already have "size" -- and you don't even seem to
On 02/08/2013 10:44:30 AM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
Eh, I shouldn't post code that quickly… Try this:
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -621,60 +621,80 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag,
nand = &nand_info[
Eh, I shouldn't post code that quickly… Try this:
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -621,60 +621,80 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag,
nand = &nand_info[dev];
s = strchr(cmd, '.');
On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> It's fine until you get a bad block in the partition, and you end up
> accessing the first block of the next partition (or getting "Attempt to
> read/write outside the flash area" if it's the last partition).
>
> Of course, fixing partition/chip
[ I started this conversation off-list before I joined the list. ]
The idea is to add .part as a valid command suffix to nand read/write so it
would match nand erase.part. The code to implement it makes "nand read.part"
act identically to "nand read".
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Scott Wood wro
On 02/07/2013 04:13:55 PM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
[ I started this conversation off-list before I joined the list. ]
The idea is to add .part as a valid command suffix to nand read/write
so it would match nand erase.part. The code to implement it makes
"nand read.part" act identically to "nan
6 matches
Mail list logo
