Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and ELDK

2008-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Roman Mashak", In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > One more question to clarify my doubts: it's valid to use ELDK > toolchain for both building bootloader and linux kernel? I ever That's the whole intention of the ELDK - one single tool chain for boot loader, Linux kernel a

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and ELDK

2008-09-17 Thread Roman Mashak
Hello, 2008/9/12 Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> What version would you recommend for arm9 development? The latest is >> 4.2, is it fine? > > ELDK 4.2 for ARM has not been released yet; that will take a few mnore > weeks (4...5, I think). Please use ELDK 4.1 for now. One more question to cl

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and ELDK

2008-09-12 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Roman, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: [snip] >> How necessary is it to install ELDK in order to be able to compile >> U-Boot for non-PPC platform? > > It's not necessary. You can use any other (decent) tool chain as > well. The nice thing with

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and ELDK

2008-09-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Roman, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > There are numerous toolchains and kits out there -- head's spinning. > ELDK is one of them. In my understanding ELDK focuses on PowerPC > architecture, but toolchains for ARM/MIPS architectures are also In theory, ELDK supports ARM, MIPS,

[U-Boot] U-Boot and ELDK

2008-09-12 Thread Roman Mashak
Hello. I apologize if my question sounds silly :) There are numerous toolchains and kits out there -- head's spinning. ELDK is one of them. In my understanding ELDK focuses on PowerPC architecture, but toolchains for ARM/MIPS architectures are also available. How reasonable is it to take it and u