On 01/08/2013 02:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
Besides, it seems that storing a bunch of *.dtb in /boot is far easier
than screwing around with FIT images, which just seem like a hopeless
mess to me; why put a filesystem inside a file when there's already a
/boot filesystem that you could use...
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 10:58 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 01/08/2013 09:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Step
On 01/08/2013 10:58 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 01/08/2013 09:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Warren
>>> wrote:
On 01/07/2013 08:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 09:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2013 08:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Curt Brune
On 01/08/2013 09:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 01/07/2013 08:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Curt Brune wrote:
On 01/07/2013 12:12 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>>>
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 08:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Curt Brune wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/07/2013 12:12 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Curt Brune,
In message <50eb0d92.2020...
On 01/07/2013 08:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Curt Brune wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/07/2013 12:12 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Curt Brune,
>>>
>>> In message <50eb0d92.2020...@cumulusnetworks.com> you wrote:
What I would love is to have a
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Curt Brune wrote:
>
>
> On 01/07/2013 12:12 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>> Dear Curt Brune,
>>
>> In message <50eb0d92.2020...@cumulusnetworks.com> you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> What I would love is to have a single multi-file uImage I could use on
>>> all my platform
On 01/07/2013 12:12 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Curt Brune,
In message <50eb0d92.2020...@cumulusnetworks.com> you wrote:
What I would love is to have a single multi-file uImage I could use on
all my platforms. The idea is to introduce a new image type that is a
list of device tree blobs.
Dear Curt Brune,
In message <50eb0d92.2020...@cumulusnetworks.com> you wrote:
>
> What I would love is to have a single multi-file uImage I could use on
> all my platforms. The idea is to introduce a new image type that is a
> list of device tree blobs.
In addition to the file system based ap
On 01/07/2013 10:36 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 01/07/2013 11:01 AM, Curt Brune wrote:
Hello,
I am following up on this thread:
"Merging device trees at runtime for module-based systems"
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-November/139618.html
I do not have a modular based system, so
On 01/07/2013 11:01 AM, Curt Brune wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am following up on this thread:
> "Merging device trees at runtime for module-based systems"
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-November/139618.html
>
> I do not have a modular based system, so I do not need the full
> flexibility
Hello,
I am following up on this thread:
"Merging device trees at runtime for module-based systems"
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-November/139618.html
I do not have a modular based system, so I do not need the full
flexibility of merging DT fragments at runtime. However, I am very
13 matches
Mail list logo
