On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 02:24:42PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:38:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Tom Rini,
> >
> > In message <20120316193030.GC31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, that said, I'm OK with everything so far and you had the last round
> >
Dear Tom Rini,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > See "arch/arm/config.mk", search for "For EABI, make sure to provide
> > raise()".
> >
> > Check why arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c does not get compiled / linked.
>
> Even if ELDK5.1 is totally fine? And other modern toolchains as well..
Yes, this probl
On 17/03/2012 16:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Tom Rini,
>>
Hi Tom,
>> In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>>
>>> OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a
>>> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>
>> OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a
>> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_OMAP I guess, 1 for everything else) for
>> everything
Dear Tom Rini,
In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a
> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_OMAP I guess, 1 for everything else) for
> everything ARM but also breaks everything else over undefined reference
> t
Am 17/03/2012 05:34, schrieb Thomas Weber:
> Hello,
> On 03/15/2012 03:01 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
Hi Thomas,
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> It applies on TI-u-boot, but TI-u-boot is still broken for Devkit8000
> (SOFT_ECC).
Yes, I have the same problem, too. The com
Hello,
On 03/15/2012 03:01 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this should be the final version for the patchset introducing
> direct Linux booting from SPL.
>
> Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified.
> Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13.
> Patch 13/13 fix a small issue by
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:38:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message <20120316193030.GC31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > OK, that said, I'm OK with everything so far and you had the last round
> > of "please fix/change this" comments. Are you happy with it all now?
Dear Tom Rini,
In message <20120316193030.GC31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> OK, that said, I'm OK with everything so far and you had the last round
> of "please fix/change this" comments. Are you happy with it all now?
We can iterate forever on improvements, or we can get it in now.
Let's do
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message <20120316172653.GD4234@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > > Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified.
> > > Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13.
> > > Patch 13/13 fix a small issue
Dear Tom Rini,
In message <20120316172653.GD4234@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified.
> > Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13.
> > Patch 13/13 fix a small issue by compiling the cam_enc_4xx
> > board (Tom Rini)
>
> My first question is,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:01:33PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this should be the final version for the patchset introducing
> direct Linux booting from SPL.
>
> Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified.
> Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13.
> Patch 13/13 fix a
Hi,
this should be the final version for the patchset introducing
direct Linux booting from SPL.
Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified.
Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13.
Patch 13/13 fix a small issue by compiling the cam_enc_4xx
board (Tom Rini)
Changelog
---
Rebased patchset to add Linux booting from SPL. As discussed
in the ML, this patchset does not make SPL common to all SOCs
to avoid breaking some architecture - this job will be done later
with a different patchset.
For this reason, a couple of patches moving files in the common/
directory are dr
On 31/01/2012 15:26, Tom Rini wrote:
>> A way can be to add an arch weak function to add arch specific
>> initialization inside board_init_*() functions, if any. Have you seen
>> other issues other what I report now ?
>
> That sounds about right. In short, ./MAKEALL -s arm still needs to
> buil
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 30/01/2012 19:05, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
>>> OK, doing a MAKEALL for omap3/4/5/am33xx/davinci shows we've got a few
>>> missing include problems, I'll go fix that up.
>>
>> OK, was it when you took over the series that you moved stu
On 30/01/2012 19:05, Tom Rini wrote:
Hi Tom,
>> OK, doing a MAKEALL for omap3/4/5/am33xx/davinci shows we've got a few
>> missing include problems, I'll go fix that up.
>
> OK, was it when you took over the series that you moved stuff to
> common/spl.c ? That idea is breaking, badly, non-omap p
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> last version of patchset has not received comments since a long time -
> Simon sends to me a confirm that tests on the devkit8000 are successful.
>
> Any chance to get the patchset merged soon or do you have any open points ?
I'v
Hi Tom,
last version of patchset has not received comments since a long time -
Simon sends to me a confirm that tests on the devkit8000 are successful.
Any chance to get the patchset merged soon or do you have any open points ?
Thanks,
Stefano
--
===
Hi,
here an updated version of the patchset to boot Linux directly from SPL.
It fixes the (minor) comments received in version 11.
List of changes:
- drop commented lines into arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile after checking build
for OMAP4/5
- use CONFIG_SPL_I2C_SUPPORT to protect I2C code
- fix TA
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 16/12/2011 16:45, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
>> I'm going to mark this series as RFC in patchwork as I see you did
>> +#ifneq... in some Makefiles and I know you know
On 16/12/2011 16:45, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
Hi Tom,
> I'm going to mark this series as RFC in patchwork as I see you did
> +#ifneq... in some Makefiles and I know you know better :) That said,
> can you confirm MAKEALL -s omap3 -s omap4
On 16/12/2011 16:45, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is a new submission of the Simon's work to add a way to
>> boot Linux directly from the SPL. From the last patchset series,
>> the main changes introduced by me are the following:
>>
>> -
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a new submission of the Simon's work to add a way to
> boot Linux directly from the SPL. From the last patchset series,
> the main changes introduced by me are the following:
>
> - compile the cache functions in SPL to make cl
Hi,
this is a new submission of the Simon's work to add a way to
boot Linux directly from the SPL. From the last patchset series,
the main changes introduced by me are the following:
- compile the cache functions in SPL to make cleanup_before_linux()
available.
- do not call I"C function on boa
25 matches
Mail list logo
