On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 01:50 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Dear Stephen Warren,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I had already tested the commit in your tree right before the reverts
>>> (a36466c50b1b3614c3cfdae194227f7dd8e2c592); that's how I noticed that
>>> the reve
On 07/08/2013 01:50 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
> [...]
>
>> I had already tested the commit in your tree right before the reverts
>> (a36466c50b1b3614c3cfdae194227f7dd8e2c592); that's how I noticed that
>> the reverts weren't necessary, since I'd expected that commit to fail
Dear Stephen Warren,
[...]
> I had already tested the commit in your tree right before the reverts
> (a36466c50b1b3614c3cfdae194227f7dd8e2c592); that's how I noticed that
> the reverts weren't necessary, since I'd expected that commit to fail
> but it didn't.
So we are now all good? Ready for re
On 07/08/2013 12:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
>> On 07/08/2013 11:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Dear Stephen Warren,
>>>
On 07/08/2013 07:25 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen
Dear Stephen Warren,
> On 07/08/2013 11:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Stephen Warren,
> >
> >> On 07/08/2013 07:25 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Warren
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On 07
On 07/08/2013 11:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
>> On 07/08/2013 07:25 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Warren
> wrote:
>> On 07/01/2013 07:49 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> On
Dear Stephen Warren,
> On 07/08/2013 07:25 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Warren
wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 07:49 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 07/08/2013 07:25 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Warren
>>> wrote:
On 07/01/2013 07:49 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> (Sorry to those on
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Warren
>> wrote:
>> > On 07/01/2013 07:49 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> >> Hi Marek,
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >>> Dear Stephen Warren,
Hi guys,
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 07/01/2013 07:49 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Dear Stephen Warren,
> >>>
> (Sorry to those on to/cc; I'm resending this so it goes to the
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 07:49 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Dear Stephen Warren,
>>>
(Sorry to those on to/cc; I'm resending this so it goes to the correct
mailing lis
On 07/01/2013 07:49 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Dear Stephen Warren,
>>
>>> (Sorry to those on to/cc; I'm resending this so it goes to the correct
>>> mailing list)
>
> Dear Stephen,
> sorry for the delay in responding to thi
Hi Marek,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
>> (Sorry to those on to/cc; I'm resending this so it goes to the correct
>> mailing list)
Dear Stephen,
sorry for the delay in responding to this.
>>
>> Commit 020bbcb "usb: hub: Power-cycle on root-hub po
Dear Stephen Warren,
> (Sorry to those on to/cc; I'm resending this so it goes to the correct
> mailing list)
>
> Commit 020bbcb "usb: hub: Power-cycle on root-hub ports" causes a
> regression on Tegra systems.
>
> The first time "usb start" is executed, it appears to work correctly.
> However,
(Sorry to those on to/cc; I'm resending this so it goes to the correct
mailing list)
Commit 020bbcb "usb: hub: Power-cycle on root-hub ports" causes a
regression on Tegra systems.
The first time "usb start" is executed, it appears to work correctly.
However, any subsequent time it is executed, it
15 matches
Mail list logo