Hi Grant,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:35:37AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Takahiro,
>
> On 17/05/2019 01:12, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> [...]
> > In fact, I have already imported relevant kernel code into U-Boot
> > and it now works perfectly with my experimental UEFI secure boot patch,
>
> Spe
Hi Takahiro,
On 17/05/2019 01:12, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
[...]
> In fact, I have already imported relevant kernel code into U-Boot
> and it now works perfectly with my experimental UEFI secure boot patch,
Speaking of which, where can I find the experimental UEFI secure boot
patches? I've not bee
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:27:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Tom, Wolfgang,
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:48:42PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Wolfgang,
> >
> > Thank you for your comments.
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Dear Akashi Takah
Tom, Wolfgang,
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:48:42PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Wolfgang,
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Akashi Takahiro,
> >
> > In message <20190517001206.gx11...@linaro.org> you wrote:
> > >
> > >
Wolfgang,
Thank you for your comments.
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Akashi Takahiro,
>
> In message <20190517001206.gx11...@linaro.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > Who: usually the responsible custodians
> >
> > "Custodians" don't always mean sub-system maintain
Dear Akashi Takahiro,
In message <20190517001206.gx11...@linaro.org> you wrote:
>
> > Who: usually the responsible custodians
>
> "Custodians" don't always mean sub-system maintainers. Right?
It's just a different name for the same thing.
> In fact, I have already imported relevant kernel code i
Thank all of you who commented on my question.
@Laszlo, I agree to the criteria that you mentioned.
good user base is a crucial factor for security code.
@Paolo, I have had no idea about license term issues. You're right.
@Heinrich, thank you for pointing out gnutls. I'm stilling looking
Tom, Wolfgang,
Thank you for your inputs.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Akashi Takahiro,
>
> In message <20190516115636.GA8052@fireball> you wrote:
> >
> > Can you give me an example of U-Boot code which comes from linux (or
> > other projects) and is reg
On 16/05/19 09:23, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> > It's also license-incompatible with U-Boot's GPLv2 I think. I guess
> > grub can use it because GPLv3 and Apache v2 can be combined just fine.
> > Reusing Linux's code seems like the best match.
> >
> > Paolo
> >
>
> You co
Dear Akashi Takahiro,
In message <20190516115636.GA8052@fireball> you wrote:
>
> Can you give me an example of U-Boot code which comes from linux (or
> other projects) and is regularly synced (or updated) with the origin?
> Who maintains that? and how?
Comes from Linux: a ton... Kconfig, Linker
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:56:40PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:13:59AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:45:54PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:39:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Hello Wolfgang,
Hi Tom,
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:13:59AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:45:54PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:39:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Hello Wolfgang,
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time with this
> > > >
> > > > There is Libr
Hi Tom,
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:39:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Hello Wolfgang,
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time with this
> > > >
> > > > There is LibreSSL as well which is a fork of openssl. Guess that too
> > > > should
> > > > be fine. What would be the more preferred solut
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:45:54PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:39:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> Thanks for taking the time with this
> > >
> > > There is LibreSSL as well which is a fork of openssl. Guess that too
> > > should
> > > be fi
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:39:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
Thanks for taking the time with this
> >
> > There is LibreSSL as well which is a fork of openssl. Guess that too should
> > be fine. What would be the more preferred solution here. The relevant bits
> > can be import
Dear Sughosh Ganu,
In message
you wrote:
>
> There is LibreSSL as well which is a fork of openssl. Guess that too should
> be fine. What would be the more preferred solution here. The relevant bits
> can be imported from the kernel code into u-boot, or there can be a
> solution with linking of
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 12:03, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
> On 4/27/19 7:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> I've done porting linux's pkcs7/x509 parsers and they work well
> with my UEFI secure boot patch, but I'm still looking for other
> options
> as well.
>
> * openssl
>
> >> I've done porting linux's pkcs7/x509 parsers and they work well
> >> with my UEFI secure boot patch, but I'm still looking for other options
> >> as well.
> >>
> >> * openssl
> >> Most of existing components linked to UEFI secure boot, including
> >> EDK2, shim and grub, reply on this lib
On 4/27/19 7:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I've done porting linux's pkcs7/x509 parsers and they work well
with my UEFI secure boot patch, but I'm still looking for other options
as well.
* openssl
Most of existing components linked to UEFI secure boot, including
EDK2, shim and grub, reply
On 04/26/19 11:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 25.04.19 04:12, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote:
>> Update and reminder.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:17:14AM +0900, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to discuss this topic in public.
>>> I will appreciate your comments here.
>>> # FYI, I n
On 25.04.19 04:12, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote:
> Update and reminder.
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:17:14AM +0900, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to discuss this topic in public.
>> I will appreciate your comments here.
>> # FYI, I now started to experimentally port linux's pkcs7/x509
Update and reminder.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:17:14AM +0900, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to discuss this topic in public.
> I will appreciate your comments here.
> # FYI, I now started to experimentally port linux's pkcs7/x509
> # parser.
I've done porting linux's pkcs7/x509 par
Hi,
I'd like to discuss this topic in public.
I will appreciate your comments here.
# FYI, I now started to experimentally port linux's pkcs7/x509
# parser.
Thanks,
-Takahiro Akashi
- Forwarded message from Simon Glass -
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 19:56:10 -0700
From: Simon Glass
To: "AKAS
23 matches
Mail list logo
