Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-05-17 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 14:02 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Tue, 03 May 2016 00:06:45 -0500 > Scott Wood wrote: > > > I usually do syncs when someone complains about needing a sync. Every > > release > > seems a bit much. I'll try to do one soon. > > Sorry to bother you with

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-05-16 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Scott, On Tue, 03 May 2016 00:06:45 -0500 Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 22:53 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:36:46 -0400 > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > >

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-05-03 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Scott, On Tue, 03 May 2016 00:06:45 -0500 Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 22:53 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:36:46 -0400 > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > >

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-05-02 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 22:53 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:36:46 -0400 > Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > I've recently contributed a lot of MTD/NAND related patches (and intend > > > t

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-04-26 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 26.04.2016 um 07:17 schrieb Heiko Schocher: > Also, as the UBI/UIFS case may show, it is not always a trivial job > to do such a sync, as concepts in Linux changes ... While we are at it, how do you QA? Did you ever port port UBI or MTD tests to u-boot and let them run? Maybe there are more iss

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-04-26 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Richard, Am 26.04.2016 um 09:20 schrieb Richard Weinberger: Am 26.04.2016 um 07:17 schrieb Heiko Schocher: Also, as the UBI/UIFS case may show, it is not always a trivial job to do such a sync, as concepts in Linux changes ... While we are at it, how do you QA? I do some very basic ub

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-04-25 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Tom, Boris, Am 25.04.2016 um 19:36 schrieb Tom Rini: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: Hi Scott, I've recently contributed a lot of MTD/NAND related patches (and intend to continue doing so). Some of them are transversal changes touching the MTD and NAND f

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-04-25 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:36:46 -0400 Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > I've recently contributed a lot of MTD/NAND related patches (and intend > > to continue doing so). Some of them are transversal changes touching the > >

Re: [U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-04-25 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Scott, > > I've recently contributed a lot of MTD/NAND related patches (and intend > to continue doing so). Some of them are transversal changes touching the > MTD and NAND framework internals, which implies patching all NAND >

[U-Boot] Porting Linux's MTD/NAND changes into U-Boot

2016-04-25 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Scott, I've recently contributed a lot of MTD/NAND related patches (and intend to continue doing so). Some of them are transversal changes touching the MTD and NAND framework internals, which implies patching all NAND drivers along with the core changes. All those changes are required to prope