On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 30 April 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > > I appreciate your help here! As you'll see, I've put together some
> > > naive patches to take care of all the boards. I expect I'm missing
> some
> > > things that you'll notice.
> >
>
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > I appreciate your help here! As you'll see, I've put together some
> > naive patches to take care of all the boards. I expect I'm missing some
> > things that you'll notice.
>
> Thanks. Seems to be fine. I expect that Stefan will complain about
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi Ben, Hi Stefan,
> >
> > I will prepare a patch for these boards on thursday:
> >
> >> AR405.h
> >> CPCIISER4.h
> >> HUB405.h
> >> OCRTC.h
> >> ORSG.h
> >> WUH405.h
> >>
> >
> > I have a cleanup patch ready for DP405 by today :-)
> >
> >> D
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Ben, Hi Stefan,
>
> I will prepare a patch for these boards on thursday:
>
>> AR405.h
>> CPCIISER4.h
>> HUB405.h
>> OCRTC.h
>> ORSG.h
>> WUH405.h
>>
>
> I have a cleanup patch ready for DP405 by today :-)
>
>> DP405.h
>>
>
>
> Matthias
>
I
On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> I will prepare a patch for these boards on thursday:
> > AR405.h
> > CPCIISER4.h
> > HUB405.h
> > OCRTC.h
> > ORSG.h
> > WUH405.h
>
> I have a cleanup patch ready for DP405 by today :-)
>
> > DP405.h
Thanks. :)
Best regards,
Stefan
==
Hi Ben, Hi Stefan,
I will prepare a patch for these boards on thursday:
> AR405.h
> CPCIISER4.h
> HUB405.h
> OCRTC.h
> ORSG.h
> WUH405.h
I have a cleanup patch ready for DP405 by today :-)
> DP405.h
Matthias
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.d
Hi Ben,
On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
> Hi Stefan (and anybody else that can answer),
>
> I'm trying to understand why some 4xx boards use CONFIG_NET_MULTI and a
> few don't. Is there a technical reason why these few can't (limited
> storage or something else) or are they just older
Hi Stefan (and anybody else that can answer),
I'm trying to understand why some 4xx boards use CONFIG_NET_MULTI and a
few don't. Is there a technical reason why these few can't (limited
storage or something else) or are they just older? There are 47 boards
in-tree that use CONFIG_PPC4xx_EMAC
8 matches
Mail list logo