Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-30 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Dirk Behme > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 4:10 PM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-17 Thread Dirk Behme
On 16.12.2010 11:10, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 14.12.2010 17:21, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Dirk, >> >> In message<4d079060.70...@googlemail.com> you wrote: >>> >>> I did a readelf analysis for 3 test cases (with 2009q1-203): >> >> Which exact versions of GCC and binutils is this? > > gcc version 4.

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-16 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 16.12.2010 16:20, schrieb Dirk Behme: > On 16.12.2010 14:47, Alexander Holler wrote: >> I'm working with the master (f8689b9eb3a7f6925cd50404a12479889188c510) >> on a beagleboard > ^^ > > ? > > This thread is about a (linking) issue building 'omap3_evm'. > > The Beagle su

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-16 Thread Dirk Behme
On 16.12.2010 14:47, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 14.12.2010 17:01, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: >> Le 14/12/2010 16:42, Dirk Behme a écrit : >> >> (agree about the analysis) >> >>> So I'd like to re-send the int conversion patch from >>> >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-December/083524.ht

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-16 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 16.12.2010 14:47, schrieb Alexander Holler: > To put some salt into the wounds ;) , Using gcc 4.5.1 board_init_f isn't > reached here. When I'm using gcc 4.3.5 it is reached. In both cases I've > used the same version of binutils, 2.20.1. > > For a test without using jtag, I've modified board_i

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-16 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 14.12.2010 17:01, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: > Le 14/12/2010 16:42, Dirk Behme a écrit : > > (agree about the analysis) > >> So I'd like to re-send the int conversion patch from >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-December/083524.html >> >> in a proper format again as a workaround for

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-16 Thread Dirk Behme
On 14.12.2010 17:21, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Dirk, > > In message<4d079060.70...@googlemail.com> you wrote: >> >> I did a readelf analysis for 3 test cases (with 2009q1-203): > > Which exact versions of GCC and binutils is this? gcc version 4.3.3 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2009q1-203). For binutils

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dirk, In message <4d079060.70...@googlemail.com> you wrote: > > I did a readelf analysis for 3 test cases (with 2009q1-203): Which exact versions of GCC and binutils is this? Do we see any differences in board/ti/evm/evm.o ? Can just use a different linker? Or use a different tool chain f

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4d0794cf.5090...@free.fr> you wrote: > > I think Wolfgang does not want this fix if it is a workaround to a bug, > although it is not clear to me if this includes toolchain bugs. In any > case, the decision will be Wolfgang's, so it's best if he's Cc:ed just >

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-14 Thread Dirk Behme
On 12.12.2010 12:40, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 12/12/2010 11:32, Dirk Behme a écrit : > > >> 2. IIRC, the linker emits a warning, not an error. We can live some > >> time with a warning if it is documented and it is being worked on. > > > > With 2009q1-203 it's an error and 'omap3_evm' isn't b

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/12/2010 16:42, Dirk Behme a écrit : (agree about the analysis) > So I'd like to re-send the int conversion patch from > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-December/083524.html > > in a proper format again as a workaround for this issue. > > Ok? I think Wolfgang does not want this

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 12/12/2010 11:32, Dirk Behme a écrit : >> 2. IIRC, the linker emits a warning, not an error. We can live some >> time with a warning if it is documented and it is being worked on. > > With 2009q1-203 it's an error and 'omap3_evm' isn't built: > > arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld: section .bss [

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-12 Thread Dirk Behme
On 12.12.2010 11:08, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Le 12/12/2010 09:25, Dirk Behme a écrit : >> >> What's the status of the linker errors across tool chain versions seen >> by building the 'omap3_evm' board? >> >> This was already discussed in the threads [1] and [2], but it seems to >> me t

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Dirk, Le 12/12/2010 09:25, Dirk Behme a écrit : > > What's the status of the linker errors across tool chain versions seen > by building the 'omap3_evm' board? > > This was already discussed in the threads [1] and [2], but it seems to > me that there was no acceptable fix, yet? > > E.g. with Co

[U-Boot] OMAP3: EVM: Linker errors across tool chain versions

2010-12-12 Thread Dirk Behme
What's the status of the linker errors across tool chain versions seen by building the 'omap3_evm' board? This was already discussed in the threads [1] and [2], but it seems to me that there was no acceptable fix, yet? E.g. with CodeSourcery's tool chain 2009q1-203 I get arm-none-linux-gnueab