[BTW, I'm not a U-Boot subscriber, so this cross-post probably won't go through]
Hi Scott,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:05 +, Naveen Mamindlapalli wrote:
>> Yes, the searching of BBT happens from the end of flash when
>> NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH opt
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:05 +, Naveen Mamindlapalli wrote:
> Cc: linux-mtd-list
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Yes, the searching of BBT happens from the end of flash when
> NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH option is used & NAND_BBT_ABSPAGE option is not
> used. The searching of BBT happens by scanning the last 4 block
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 15:16 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 09:46 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 13:43 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi Scott and others,
> >>
> >> I have a question regarding BBT position and number of blocks allocated
> >> for BBT.
> >>
> >> Did you f
On 02/04/2014 09:46 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 13:43 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Scott and others,
>>
>> I have a question regarding BBT position and number of blocks allocated
>> for BBT.
>>
>> Did you face the issue with last 4 blocks broken in any NAND flash
>> device sin
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 13:43 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Scott and others,
>
> I have a question regarding BBT position and number of blocks allocated
> for BBT.
>
> Did you face the issue with last 4 blocks broken in any NAND flash
> device since the default option in Linux/u-boot BBM is last
Hi Scott and others,
I have a question regarding BBT position and number of blocks allocated
for BBT.
Did you face the issue with last 4 blocks broken in any NAND flash
device since the default option in Linux/u-boot BBM is last 4 blocks?
It doesn't mean that if the last 4 blocks are broken than
6 matches
Mail list logo
