Yeah, maybe you're right the fault is of gmail.
Jerry Van Baren ha scritto:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 06:12:21 Marco wrote:
>>> Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list
>>> that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thin
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 06:12:21 Marco wrote:
>> Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list
>> that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thing is
>> however that everybody can read it.
>
> ive received both of the imls uti
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 06:12:21 Marco wrote:
> Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list
> that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thing is
> however that everybody can read it.
ive received both of the imls util e-mails in question. as for
Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list
that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thing is
however that everybody can read it.
Liu Dave-R63238 ha scritto:
>> Thank you very much for information Wolfgang. However I don't
>> understand
>> why I di
> Thank you very much for information Wolfgang. However I don't
> understand
> why I didn't receive my post on the mailing list, I'm afraid that even
> other people didn't receive it and then I don't receive any
> comments. I checked the option "Receive your own posts to the list" on
my setting
>
Thank you very much for information Wolfgang. However I don't understand
why I didn't receive my post on the mailing list, I'm afraid that even
other people didn't receive it and then I don't receive any comments. I
checked the option "Receive your own posts to the list" on my setting
and it sets t
Dear Marco,
In message <49d32ab2.10...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> I agree with Liu Dave. I sent a patch two times about a new tools
> command called imls, but I didn't receive back the patch (neither the
> first nor the second time) as list subscriber so I'm not sure that the
> patch has been receive
Mar 28:
[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add imls utility command - … new command called
imls. It's goal is the same of UBoot's imls but it has to be used as …
Mar 30:
[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add imls utility command - … new command called
imls. Its goal is the same of UBoot imls but it can be used as Linux
shell …
I agree with Liu Dave. I sent a patch two times about a new tools
command called imls, but I didn't receive back the patch (neither the
first nor the second time) as list subscriber so I'm not sure that the
patch has been received. Wolfgang, can you confirm to me that the patch
has been received? I
Dear "Liu Dave-R63238",
In message
you wrote:
>
> I often miss some mails from u-boot@lists.denx.de in these days,
> For example, we didn't receive the 8569 support patch from lists,
> and didn't receive the mail from Kim
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049890.html
> http://l
Hello all,
I often miss some mails from u-boot@lists.denx.de in these days,
For example, we didn't receive the 8569 support patch from lists,
and didn't receive the mail from Kim
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049890.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049891.ht
11 matches
Mail list logo
