Re: [U-Boot] MACB and DM9000 support for AT91SAM9260

2008-09-03 Thread Frank van der Schoot
This is certainly a good option, maybe I try to make the dm9000x-driver a eth_device. But if this is too hard than this will be my fall-back scenario. {--- I think that the mac address of the dm9000 is on the eeprom. Linux write it using ethtool. Take a look at the dm9000_write_eeprom in the

Re: [U-Boot] MACB and DM9000 support for AT91SAM9260

2008-09-02 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
[Re-adding mailing list to Cc] "Frank van der Schoot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well after some more investigation: the macb-driver is creating an > eth_device-structure and this structure is initialised in > macb_eth_initialize() and then registered with eth_register(). So this > gives it some

Re: [U-Boot] MACB and DM9000 support for AT91SAM9260

2008-09-02 Thread michael
Hi, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > "Frank v/d Schoot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We have a board with 2 ethernet ports: one on the macb and the other on a >> dm9000-chip. Got them both working under linux but the dm9000 doesn't get a >> MAC-address assigned now. I would like to give the dm9000

Re: [U-Boot] MACB and DM9000 support for AT91SAM9260

2008-09-02 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
"Frank v/d Schoot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have a board with 2 ethernet ports: one on the macb and the other on a > dm9000-chip. Got them both working under linux but the dm9000 doesn't get a > MAC-address assigned now. I would like to give the dm9000 its MAC-address in > U-Boot via a envir

[U-Boot] MACB and DM9000 support for AT91SAM9260

2008-09-02 Thread Frank v/d Schoot
Hi All, We have a board with 2 ethernet ports: one on the macb and the other on a dm9000-chip. Got them both working under linux but the dm9000 doesn't get a MAC-address assigned now. I would like to give the dm9000 its MAC-address in U-Boot via a environment-variable. Because I'm new to U-Boot, I