Hi Michael,
> Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
>> Can't remember, possibly it was a hack.
>>
> Seems so. I tried to put it in my 1.3.3, but 'ls' never returns :-(
>
> So I will wait for Detlev Zundel.
Actually someone doing the development for DENX will post the code, but
it will not be
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
> Can't remember, possibly it was a hack.
>
Seems so. I tried to put it in my 1.3.3, but 'ls' never returns :-(
So I will wait for Detlev Zundel.
Michael
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://l
Detlev Zundel schrieb:
>> Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
>
> We are currently working on such a speedup bringing U-Boot up to par
> with Linux. I am confident that we can post our results in the next
> week.
>
Sounds promising!
> PS: Wow, message-mode in Emacs wants a
Hi Michael,
> Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> > Hi *,
>> >
>> > please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
>> > As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
>> > supporting summary. (B
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:49 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
> > > Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
> >
> > Yes, there was an attempt some time ago(months or a year, dunno) where
> > someone had improved scanning dramatically, patch
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
> > Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
>
> Yes, there was an attempt some time ago(months or a year, dunno) where
> someone had improved scanning dramatically, patch was posted to the
> u-boot list. Can't remember who though.
Seems to
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 11:34 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > > Hi *,
> > >
> > > please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
> > > As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > Hi *,
> >
> > please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
> > As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
> > supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
> As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
> supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS2 but only JFFS support?)
It is not missing SUMMARY, it
Hi *,
please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS2 but only JFFS support?)
So my question:
Has anybody done or is planning in next time (~weeks) to add summary support for
10 matches
Mail list logo
