Hi,
On 4 November 2014 08:21, Weiß Christoph wrote:
> Well, for me it works with type kernel and loading it to a higher RAM address
> than the load address and entry point. I'm not exactly sure if kernel_noload
> is supported with Tegra. Is type kernel completely wrong?
I'm just not sure why y
Hi,
(trying again)
On 29 October 2014 08:22, Weiß Christoph wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to get my own build of U-Boot to boot Linux on a Jetson TK1
> board. As we are pushing for verified boot I am using the Flat Image Tree
> (unifying kernel image, device tree blob, ...) to describe my
-Boot] Flat Image Tree and boot arguments
On 10/29/2014 08:22 AM, Weiß Christoph wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to get my own build of U-Boot to boot Linux on a Jetson TK1
> board. As we are pushing for verified boot I am using the Flat Image Tree
> (unifying kernel image, d
On 10/29/2014 08:22 AM, Weiß Christoph wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to get my own build of U-Boot to boot Linux on a Jetson TK1 board.
As we are pushing for verified boot I am using the Flat Image Tree (unifying
kernel image, device tree blob, ...) to describe my system. U-Boot can load the
I
On 29 October 2014 19:52, Weiß Christoph wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to get my own build of U-Boot to boot Linux on a Jetson TK1
> board. As we are pushing for verified boot I am using the Flat Image Tree
> (unifying kernel image, device tree blob, ...) to describe my system. U-Boot
> ca
Dear all,
I am trying to get my own build of U-Boot to boot Linux on a Jetson TK1 board.
As we are pushing for verified boot I am using the Flat Image Tree (unifying
kernel image, device tree blob, ...) to describe my system. U-Boot can load the
ITB file and tries to start the kernel but the sy
6 matches
Mail list logo
