Re: [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards

2014-04-23 Thread York Sun
On 04/18/2014 09:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:38:32AM -0700, York Sun wrote: >> On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, >>> MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in th

Re: [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards

2014-04-18 Thread York Sun
On 04/18/2014 09:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:38:32AM -0700, York Sun wrote: >> On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, >>> MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in th

Re: [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards

2014-04-18 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:38:32AM -0700, York Sun wrote: > On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, > > MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can > > we come up with somethi

Re: [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards

2014-04-18 Thread York Sun
On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey guys, > > Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, > MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can > we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks! > Tom, Freescale board maint

[U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards

2014-04-18 Thread Tom Rini
Hey guys, Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature _