Re: [U-Boot] Expanding checkpatch for non-linux (specifically U-Boot) use

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:22 +1000, Graeme Russ wrote: > I like this - And checkpatch.pl could set the default options for 'Linux > flavour' so Linux would not need a .conf file :) > > BUT - The question still remains - Will patches for obviously non-Linux > related 'features' of checkpatch be welc

Re: [U-Boot] Expanding checkpatch for non-linux (specifically U-Boot) use

On 25/04/11 16:02, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 15:36 +1000, Graeme Russ wrote: >> There has been a bit of discussion lately on the U-Boot mailing list >> regarding the use of checkpatch for U-Boot patches (see >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-April/090954.html) >> >> U-B

Re: [U-Boot] Expanding checkpatch for non-linux (specifically U-Boot) use

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 15:36 +1000, Graeme Russ wrote: > There has been a bit of discussion lately on the U-Boot mailing list > regarding the use of checkpatch for U-Boot patches (see > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-April/090954.html) > > U-Boot uses the Linux coding style and checkpat

[U-Boot] Expanding checkpatch for non-linux (specifically U-Boot) use

Hi all, There has been a bit of discussion lately on the U-Boot mailing list regarding the use of checkpatch for U-Boot patches (see http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-April/090954.html) U-Boot uses the Linux coding style and checkpatch is therefore a very good tool for us to use to check