Hi Marek,
On 19/08/2013 22:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Fabio Estevam,
>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> L2CC on MX53 is enabled by setting just the L2ON and C bits in CP15,
>>> there's no configuration. Not even Linux enables the L2CC on MX53, so if
>
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > L2CC on MX53 is enabled by setting just the L2ON and C bits in CP15,
> > there's no configuration. Not even Linux enables the L2CC on MX53, so if
> > it's not on in U- Boot, then it's not on at all (and t
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> L2CC on MX53 is enabled by setting just the L2ON and C bits in CP15, there's
> no
> configuration. Not even Linux enables the L2CC on MX53, so if it's not on in
> U-
> Boot, then it's not on at all (and that sucks).
This is what
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> Hi Dirk,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> > Is the mx53 L2 cache the same like on mx6?
>
> I think they are different.
>
> On mx6 the L2 cache controller is memory mapped ,but on mx53 there is
> no L2 cache entry in its memory map.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi Dirk,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Is the mx53 L2 cache the same like on mx6?
I think they are different.
On mx6 the L2 cache controller is memory mapped ,but on mx53 there is
no L2 cache entry in its memory map.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
Am 19.08.2013 15:55, schrieb Fabio Estevam:
Hi,
I notice slow tftp transfer on mx53qsb and I suspected it could be due
to L2 cache being disabled.
Tried enabling with:
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S
@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@
#endif
Hi,
I notice slow tftp transfer on mx53qsb and I suspected it could be due
to L2 cache being disabled.
Tried enabling with:
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S
@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@
#endif
mcr 15, 1, r0, c9, c0, 2
+
+ /* enable L
7 matches
Mail list logo