Re: [U-Boot] DM9000 issue in DM355

2009-10-21 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Sandeep, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > Ben, > > I was taking a closer look at the DM9000 driver by trying it on the DM355 > EVM. And it behaving a little different from before, i.e before we moved to > the NET_MULTI stuff. > > When the board comes after I reflash with a new U-boot image, I no lon

Re: [U-Boot] DM9000 issue in DM355

2009-10-20 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > > Stefano, > > > > Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > > Ben, > > > > > Hi, > > > > > When the board comes after I reflash with a new U-boot image, I no > > > longer see the ethaddr being set. But when I do a tftp I can see the > > > ethaddr being read. tftp complains and says no ethaddr set. > > >

Re: [U-Boot] DM9000 issue in DM355

2009-10-20 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Stefano, > > Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > Ben, > > > Hi, > > > When the board comes after I reflash with a new U-boot image, I no > > longer see the ethaddr being set. But when I do a tftp I can see the > > ethaddr being read. tftp complains and says no ethaddr set. > > Not sure, but it seems th

Re: [U-Boot] DM9000 issue in DM355

2009-10-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > Ben, > Hi, > When the board comes after I reflash with a new U-boot image, I no > longer see the ethaddr being set. But when I do a tftp I can see the > ethaddr being read. tftp complains and says no ethaddr set. Not sure, but it seems that the mac address is read from

[U-Boot] DM9000 issue in DM355

2009-10-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Ben, I was taking a closer look at the DM9000 driver by trying it on the DM355 EVM. And it behaving a little different from before, i.e before we moved to the NET_MULTI stuff. When the board comes after I reflash with a new U-boot image, I no longer see the ethaddr being set. But when I do a t