Wednesday 15 July 2009 18:09:30 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> > CONFIG_API worked fine for ARM builds some time ago, and this breakage
> > seems like a recent development.
>
> or, it still works fine if your toolchain doesnt suck and isnt broken
> -mike
I have done some research and mike is right.
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200907161046.32385...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> Just to make it clear: The libgcc removal patches for ARM from Jean-Christophe
> are not added yet. ...
Just to make it clear: The libgcc removal patches for ARM will never
be added - at least not in their current form.
Hi Stefan,
On 2009-07-16, at 10:46, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 16 July 2009 10:37:34 Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
>> On 2009-07-15, at 18:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 11:15:46 Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
On 2009-07-15, at 16:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday
Hi Rafal,
On Thursday 16 July 2009 10:37:34 Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
> On 2009-07-15, at 18:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 11:15:46 Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
> >> On 2009-07-15, at 16:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:47:26 Piotr Zięcik wrote:
>
On 2009-07-15, at 18:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 11:15:46 Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
>> On 2009-07-15, at 16:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:47:26 Piotr Zięcik wrote:
While working on U-Boot for our board we have found problem related
to C
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 11:15:46 Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
> On 2009-07-15, at 16:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:47:26 Piotr Zięcik wrote:
> >> While working on U-Boot for our board we have found problem related
> >> to CONFIG_API option. In general, enabling it causes bui
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 17:12:57 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > I vote for accepting Jean-Christophe's libgcc patches in the latest
> > version. They definitely fix some ugly problems seen on ARM (build
> > failures, etc) and make life easier.
>
> They have been rejected, and I will not a
On 2009-07-15, at 16:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:47:26 Piotr Zięcik wrote:
>> While working on U-Boot for our board we have found problem related
>> to
>> CONFIG_API option. In general, enabling it causes build failure.
>> Our tests
>> showed that problem exists als
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200907151710.04262...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> I vote for accepting Jean-Christophe's libgcc patches in the latest version.
> They definitely fix some ugly problems seen on ARM (build failures, etc) and
> make life easier.
They have been rejected, and I will not ac
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 16:58:40 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:47:26 Piotr Zięcik wrote:
> > While working on U-Boot for our board we have found problem related to
> > CONFIG_API option. In general, enabling it causes build failure. Our
> > tests showed that problem exists al
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:47:26 Piotr Zięcik wrote:
> While working on U-Boot for our board we have found problem related to
> CONFIG_API option. In general, enabling it causes build failure. Our tests
> showed that problem exists also on other ARM U-Boot targets (for example
> davinci_dvevm).
>
>
Hi.
While working on U-Boot for our board we have found problem related to
CONFIG_API option. In general, enabling it causes build failure. Our tests
showed that problem exists also on other ARM U-Boot targets (for example
davinci_dvevm).
Do you think that this problem may be caused by your li
12 matches
Mail list logo
