On 05/20/2016 04:23 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Marek,
>>>
>>> Could you revert 291000894ed4d6257830baba547764b86e335b5c and/or
>>> submit a patch to move CONFIG_SPL_EXT_SUPPORT back into the board
>>> config? It looks like the novena board was t
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Marek,
>>
>> Could you revert 291000894ed4d6257830baba547764b86e335b5c and/or
>> submit a patch to move CONFIG_SPL_EXT_SUPPORT back into the board
>> config? It looks like the novena board was the only one using it and
>> it breaks Ventana bui
Hi Marek, Tim,
On 20/05/2016 15:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Could you revert 291000894ed4d6257830baba547764b86e335b5c and/or
>> submit a patch to move CONFIG_SPL_EXT_SUPPORT back into the board
>> config? It looks like the novena board was the only one using it and
>> it breaks Ventana build.
>
>
On 05/20/2016 03:10 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 05/20/2016 02:41 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> Hi Tim,
>>>
>>> On 19/05/2016 16:34, Tim Harvey wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 19/05/
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 02:41 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> On 19/05/2016 16:34, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Tim,
On 19/05/2016 15:48, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, May 19,
On 05/20/2016 02:41 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 19/05/2016 16:34, Tim Harvey wrote:
>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> Hi Tim,
>>>
>>> On 19/05/2016 15:48, Tim Harvey wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>>>
Hi Tim,
On 19/05/2016 16:34, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> On 19/05/2016 15:48, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Tim,
last changes break build for the gw_ventana board. In fa
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 19/05/2016 15:48, Tim Harvey wrote:
>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> Hi Tim,
>>>
>>> last changes break build for the gw_ventana board. In fact, in case
>>> kernel is on a fs, we need to pass the na
Hi Tim,
On 19/05/2016 15:48, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> last changes break build for the gw_ventana board. In fact, in case
>> kernel is on a fs, we need to pass the name for kernel. These two
>> defines should be set into gw_ventan
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> last changes break build for the gw_ventana board. In fact, in case
> kernel is on a fs, we need to pass the name for kernel. These two
> defines should be set into gw_ventana.h:
>
> CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_KERNEL_NAME
>
Hi Tim,
last changes break build for the gw_ventana board. In fact, in case
kernel is on a fs, we need to pass the name for kernel. These two
defines should be set into gw_ventana.h:
CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_KERNEL_NAME
CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_ARGS_NAME
I could simply fix it, but it does n
11 matches
Mail list logo