On Wed 16 Dec 2009 21:55, Rob Westfall pondered:
> Where exactly is the line for what you have to provide vs what you
> don't have to provide?
>
> We are building boards that are based on a standard board, but we have
> obviously had to modify include/config/ to setup for our
> hardware and create
Dear Rob Westfall,
In message <63e059e40912161855q31eb64e4h84f8fbbdb088a...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
> Where exactly is the line for what you have to provide vs what you
> don't have to provide?
If you want to know exactly, then please read the GPL itself (see file
COPYING in the top level dir
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:55:01 Rob Westfall wrote:
> Where exactly is the line for what you have to provide vs what you
> don't have to provide?
also, this is what you should be asking your lawyers. legal advice on random
mailing lists is a waste of time.
-mike
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:55:01 Rob Westfall wrote:
> Where exactly is the line for what you have to provide vs what you
> don't have to provide?
>
> We are building boards that are based on a standard board, but we have
> obviously had to modify include/config/ to setup for our
> hardware
Where exactly is the line for what you have to provide vs what you
don't have to provide?
We are building boards that are based on a standard board, but we have
obviously had to modify include/config/ to setup for our
hardware and create customized files to support our board. We have
NOT modified
Dear "Hekko",
In message <10217154154b296a67e0c072.86674490.active.m...@poczta.nazwa.pl> you
wrote:
>
> Easy Albert, it was just a question about GPL ;-) also according to my local
> law
> I can ask any question. In that case, to make it official: I'm sorry anyone
> who
> felt offended and took
>
> I would suggest to be very cautious with such statements. You had better
> be in possession of valid, and legally obtained, proof of each and every
> one of the statements you made, otherwise you might be put to trial for
> libel. I don't know about your local law, but under French libel la
Dear "Hekko",
In message <21445806094b2958a71cfb50.07474534.active.m...@poczta.nazwa.pl> you
wrote:
>
> Just a quick question: u-boot boot loader/linux kernel/bash is GPL
> right ? ...
Yes, but there are different versions of the GPL. U-Boot is currently
"GPLv2+"; Linux is "GPLv2"; bash is curr
Hello,
Just a quick question: u-boot boot loader/linux kernel/bash is GPL right ? So
whoever is using it he should public entire source code with an annotation that
it's based on u-boot boot loader/linux kernel/bash ?
Well, I'm a software programmer in the LG Electronics company, all these TVs
9 matches
Mail list logo
