On 09/04/2012 03:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Am 03/09/2012 20:02, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>
> Hi Albert,
>
>
>>> One of them uses u-boot-imx for his development, and of course after I
>>> rebased my tree he got into trouble, due to using a commit that does
>>> not exist anymo
Hi Stefano,
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:37:52 +0200, Stefano Babic
wrote:
> > OTOH, we all can see Wolfgang sometimes performing pulls by merging,
> > so he might have a different view on this.
>
> Of course ;-)
And so he has expressed, before your reply actually, and clearly
expressed a preference
Am 03/09/2012 20:02, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Albert,
>> One of them uses u-boot-imx for his development, and of course after I
>> rebased my tree he got into trouble, due to using a commit that does
>> not exist anymore.
>
> You mean a commit ID that does not exist any more,
Dear Albert,
In message <20120903214729.4f3949e7@lilith> you wrote:
>
> > I seriously dislike this for the master branch.
>
> Stefano's reference was about u-boot-arm specifically, and so was my
> comment to it. I do agree with you re: the U-Boot master branch (see
> below for additional notes)
Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:13:28 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Albert,
>
> In message <20120903200244.2ddad7d4@lilith> you wrote:
> >
> > > One of them uses u-boot-imx for his development, and of course
> > > after I rebased my tree he got into trouble, due to using a
> > > commi
Dear Albert,
In message <20120903200244.2ddad7d4@lilith> you wrote:
>
> > One of them uses u-boot-imx for his development, and of course after I
> > rebased my tree he got into trouble, due to using a commit that does
> > not exist anymore.
>
> You mean a commit ID that does not exist any more,
Dear Stefano,
In message <5044a44f.2050...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> One of them uses u-boot-imx for his development, and of course after I
> rebased my tree he got into trouble, due to using a commit that does not
> exist anymore.
Thanks for bringing up this topic.
> Albert has described the way
Hi Stefano,
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:36:31 +0200, Stefano Babic
wrote:
> Hi all ARM Custodians,
>
> I was thinking about the way we are usual to manage our trees. This
> comes because I know about issues from users who set their development
> on ARM-repositories.
>
> One of them uses u-boot-imx
On 03/09/2012 15:13, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 09/03/2012 02:36 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> I was thinking about the way we are usual to manage our trees. This
>> comes because I know about issues from users who set their development
>> on ARM-repositories.
>>
>> One of them uses u-
Hi Stefano,
On 09/03/2012 02:36 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> I was thinking about the way we are usual to manage our trees. This
> comes because I know about issues from users who set their development
> on ARM-repositories.
>
> One of them uses u-boot-imx for his development, and of course after I
Hi all ARM Custodians,
I was thinking about the way we are usual to manage our trees. This
comes because I know about issues from users who set their development
on ARM-repositories.
One of them uses u-boot-imx for his development, and of course after I
rebased my tree he got into trouble, due to
11 matches
Mail list logo
