On 09/07/2011 04:34 AM, Arno Steffen wrote:
> "# save
> Saving Environment to NAND...
> Erasing Nand...
> Warning: Erase size 0x2000 smaller than one erase block 0x0002
> Erasing 0x0002 instead
> Skipping bad block at 0x000c
>
> Writing to Nand... FAILED!"
In newer versi
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:20:51PM +0200, Arno Steffen wrote:
>
> There is a question left for redundancy, which is imho a bug (or maybe
> I don't get the design concept of redundancy):
> If I have an empty environment (both standard and redund - env1 and
> env2 ) and boot, it recognizes CRC erro
2011/9/7 Wolfgang Wegner :
> Hi,
>
> sorry, not sure about it right now, but could it be you simply need
> to define CONFIG_ENV_RANGE to some multiple of the sector size?
>
> At least is what I seem to remember...
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
You are my hero - thats what I'm looking for ! Out of all boards
in
Hi,
sorry, not sure about it right now, but could it be you simply need
to define CONFIG_ENV_RANGE to some multiple of the sector size?
At least is what I seem to remember...
Wolfgang
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/m
2011/9/7 Wolfgang Wegner :
> Hi Arno,
>
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 08:20:22AM +0200, Arno Steffen wrote:
>> Hi Marek and Wolfgang, Thanks for your answers.
>> I kept already one sector space for bad blocks, so 1st environment is
>> at c., 2nd at 10.. Blocksize is 2. (so 1 block left).
>>
Hi Arno,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 08:20:22AM +0200, Arno Steffen wrote:
> Hi Marek and Wolfgang, Thanks for your answers.
> I kept already one sector space for bad blocks, so 1st environment is
> at c., 2nd at 10.. Blocksize is 2. (so 1 block left).
> Maybe I have to announce uboot, tha
2011/9/6 Marek Vasut :
> On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 04:16:59 PM Arno Steffen wrote:
>> NAND is sufferered from Bad blocks and bit errors. Thats why usually
>> exists a bad block handling and an ECC. Am I wrong, that I miss both
>> on uboot for it's environment?
>> Or is my uboot just to old (2
Hi Arno,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:16:59PM +0200, Arno Steffen wrote:
> NAND is sufferered from Bad blocks and bit errors. Thats why usually
> exists a bad block handling and an ECC. Am I wrong, that I miss both
> on uboot for it's environment?
U-Boot 2010.06 already has bad block handling in t
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 04:16:59 PM Arno Steffen wrote:
> NAND is sufferered from Bad blocks and bit errors. Thats why usually
> exists a bad block handling and an ECC. Am I wrong, that I miss both
> on uboot for it's environment?
> Or is my uboot just to old (2010.06) and newer versions ha
NAND is sufferered from Bad blocks and bit errors. Thats why usually
exists a bad block handling and an ECC. Am I wrong, that I miss both
on uboot for it's environment?
Or is my uboot just to old (2010.06) and newer versions handle this?
Is there a special setting necessary to handle this?
I see t
10 matches
Mail list logo
