On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Mike Frysinger,
>
> In message <201004231137.16732.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>>
>> because the post/ dir has historically been ppc-only (literally sprinkled
>> with
>> code that would not compile for any other arch), we were filter
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201004231533.58136.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> it. i could just as easily say "i'd rather the code didnt assume powerpc
> everywhere", but it isnt like that gets us from point a to point b.
I would have preferred an architecture neutral implementation as w
On Friday 23 April 2010 15:30:09 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > because the post/ dir has historically been ppc-only (literally sprinkled
> > with code that would not compile for any other arch), we were filtering
> > post/ out in the top level Makefile for Blackfin targets.
> > i
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201004231137.16732.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> because the post/ dir has historically been ppc-only (literally sprinkled
> with
> code that would not compile for any other arch), we were filtering post/ out
> in the top level Makefile for Blackfin targets.
On Friday 23 April 2010 12:31:21 Michael Zaidman wrote:
> Will you fix the CONFIG_{MMC,SPI_MMC} in the bf537-stamp.h header by
> yourself or you want me to do it it this patch set?
i'll take care of it
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 23 April 2010 11:21:28 Michael Zaidman wrote:
>> BTW, looking on the blackfin POST implementation I wonder if it was
>> used recently. Enabling POST on the bf537-stamp board caused the
>> post_list array of post/tests.c to be linke
On Friday 23 April 2010 11:21:28 Michael Zaidman wrote:
> BTW, looking on the blackfin POST implementation I wonder if it was
> used recently. Enabling POST on the bf537-stamp board caused the
> post_list array of post/tests.c to be linked instead of
> arch/blackfin/cpu/lib/tests.c as was expected.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 23 April 2010 10:10:16 Michael Zaidman wrote:
>> Compiling the bf537-stamp board I got the following linker error:
>> /home/mike/develop/u-boot/u-boot-patch/common/cmd_mmc.c:53: undefined
>> reference to `mmc_legacy_init'
>> /home/
On Friday 23 April 2010 10:10:16 Michael Zaidman wrote:
> Compiling the bf537-stamp board I got the following linker error:
> /home/mike/develop/u-boot/u-boot-patch/common/cmd_mmc.c:53: undefined
> reference to `mmc_legacy_init'
> /home/mike/develop/u-boot/u-boot-patch/common/cmd_mmc.c:53: relocati
Hi,
Compiling the bf537-stamp board I got the following linker error:
/home/mike/develop/u-boot/u-boot-patch/common/cmd_mmc.c:53: undefined
reference to `mmc_legacy_init'
/home/mike/develop/u-boot/u-boot-patch/common/cmd_mmc.c:53: relocation
truncated to fit: R_pcrel24 against undefined symbol `mmc
10 matches
Mail list logo
