On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> If I understand you correctly, you suggest adding of direct “weak” calls
>> before and after call to POST test callback in the post_run_single
>> routine of post.c file
>> instead of adding callbacks to the post_test structur
Hi Michael,
> If I understand you correctly, you suggest adding of direct “weak” calls
> before and after call to POST test callback in the post_run_single
> routine of post.c file
> instead of adding callbacks to the post_test structure.
> Agree, its has the same measure of flexibility.
Yes, I w
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
Working on the POST for our board (which I am going to submit
to the u-boot in the near future) I was asked to output the POST tests
s
Hi Michael,
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>>> Working on the POST for our board (which I am going to submit
>>> to the u-boot in the near future) I was asked to output the POST tests
>>> sequence progress to the dedicated LEDs (current test’s index and
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> Working on the POST for our board (which I am going to submit
>> to the u-boot in the near future) I was asked to output the POST tests
>> sequence progress to the dedicated LEDs (current test’s index and
>> test’s result – P
Hi Michael,
> Working on the POST for our board (which I am going to submit
> to the u-boot in the near future) I was asked to output the POST tests
> sequence progress to the dedicated LEDs (current test’s index and
> test’s result – PASS or FAIL) in addition to the conventional console
> output.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michael Zaidman,
>
> In message <660c0f821002100159i1a956edfx1c76945042f51...@mail.gmail.com>
you wrote:
>>
SGVsbG8sCgpXb3JraW5nIG9uIHRoZSBQT1NUIGZvciBvdXIgYm9hcmQgKHdoaWNoIEkgYW0gZ29p
...
>
> Please do not send base 64 encoded messages.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael Zaidman
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Michael Zaidman,
> >
> > In message <660c0f821002100159i1a956edfx1c76945042f51...@mail.gmail.com>
> > you wrote:
> >> SGVsbG8sCgpXb3JraW5nIG9uIHRoZSBQT1NUIGZvciBvdXIgYm9hc
Hello,
Working on the POST for our board (which I am going to submit
to the u-boot in the near future) I was asked to output the POST tests
sequence progress to the dedicated LEDs (current test’s index and
test’s result – PASS or FAIL) in addition to the conventional console
output. Such indicatio
9 matches
Mail list logo
