Re: [U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-06 Thread Zhong Hongbo
On 06/09/12 03:22, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 05/09/2012 16:45, Zhong Hongbo wrote: >> On 04/09/12 23:57, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> On 04/09/2012 16:03, Zhong Hongbo wrote: On 03/09/12 08:14, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Zhong Hongbo, > >> From: Zhong Hongbo >> >> When the u-bo

Re: [U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-05 Thread Stefano Babic
On 05/09/2012 16:45, Zhong Hongbo wrote: > On 04/09/12 23:57, Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 04/09/2012 16:03, Zhong Hongbo wrote: >>> On 03/09/12 08:14, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Zhong Hongbo, > From: Zhong Hongbo > > When the u-boot address of destination equal to __start, >

Re: [U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-05 Thread Zhong Hongbo
On 04/09/12 23:57, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 04/09/2012 16:03, Zhong Hongbo wrote: >> On 03/09/12 08:14, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> Dear Zhong Hongbo, >>> From: Zhong Hongbo When the u-boot address of destination equal to __start, no relocation. relocation offset(r9) = 0. >>> >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-04 Thread Stefano Babic
On 04/09/2012 16:03, Zhong Hongbo wrote: > On 03/09/12 08:14, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Dear Zhong Hongbo, >> >>> From: Zhong Hongbo >>> >>> When the u-boot address of destination equal to __start, >>> no relocation. relocation offset(r9) = 0. >> >> Good, now what kind of issue does this patch fix? >

Re: [U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-04 Thread Zhong Hongbo
On 03/09/12 08:14, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Zhong Hongbo, > >> From: Zhong Hongbo >> >> When the u-boot address of destination equal to __start, >> no relocation. relocation offset(r9) = 0. > > Good, now what kind of issue does this patch fix? Hi Marek When you adopt CONFIG_SPL_BUILD framewor

Re: [U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-02 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Zhong Hongbo, > From: Zhong Hongbo > > When the u-boot address of destination equal to __start, > no relocation. relocation offset(r9) = 0. Good, now what kind of issue does this patch fix? > Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo > --- > Change for V3: > - Drop the change of arm720t, It has

Re: [U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-01 Thread Zhong Hongbo
Sorry, Add Albert to the thread. Thanks, hongbo On 02/09/12 14:49, Zhong Hongbo wrote: > From: Zhong Hongbo > > When the u-boot address of destination equal to __start, > no relocation. relocation offset(r9) = 0. > > Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo > --- > Change for V3: > - Drop the change

[U-Boot] [v3] arm: Fixed the offset for the no relocation.

2012-09-01 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo When the u-boot address of destination equal to __start, no relocation. relocation offset(r9) = 0. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo --- Change for V3: - Drop the change of arm720t, It has already merge the change. Change for V2: - Clean a line for arm1176. --- ar