Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <20090613145439.gg25...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > i dont get it. the CPP expands into if(0) and unless you have a completely
> > shitty compiler, gcc will do dead code elimination on it resulting in the
> > same
> > binary size.
> I'v
On 00:01 Fri 19 Jun , Ben Warren wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
> >
> >> Applied to net repo.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
> > into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
> > I saw y
David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> Applied to net repo.
>>
>
> Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
> into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
> I saw you moving things out of cpu/* a while back.
>
> - Dave
>
>
On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
> Applied to net repo.
Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
I saw you moving things out of cpu/* a while back.
- Dave
___
U-Boot
David,
David Brownell wrote:
> CSB337 boards originally shipped with MicroMonitor, not U-Boot;
> and with a version using a different convention for recording
> Ethernet addresses than anyone else. To avoid breaking Linux
> when it uses U-Boot, have it use the same convention on that
> hardware.
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > See above. There already *IS* such an #ifdef, but it's just not
> > > > > cluttering up the guts of that driver.
> > > >
> > > > you adding MUST have NO size impact on other board
> > > >
> > > > if we apply you code as it we will increase
On Saturday 13 June 2009 10:54:39 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 10:50 Sat 13 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 13 June 2009 08:28:23 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > On 04:13 Sat 13 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Chri
On 10:50 Sat 13 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 13 June 2009 08:28:23 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 04:13 Sat 13 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > > The machine_is_X() macros are automatical
On 04:13 Sat 13 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > >
> > > The machine_is_X() macros are automatically #ifdeffed in
> > > the header; no size impact. Read ...
> >
> > If I use this pacth on the rm9200ek the u-boot.bin size will
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >
> > The machine_is_X() macros are automatically #ifdeffed in
> > the header; no size impact. Read ...
>
> If I use this pacth on the rm9200ek the u-boot.bin size will increase
> for nothing
I'm not following you. The lines a
On 15:02 Fri 12 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 11:14 Tue 09 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
>
> > I'm not really a fan of this
> > but ok if I see the csn337 board patch
>
> I meant to send that in before, thanks for the re
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 11:14 Tue 09 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
>
>> CSB337 boards originally shipped with MicroMonitor, not U-Boot;
>> and with a version using a different convention for recording
>> Ethernet addresses than anyone else. To avoid breaking Linux
>> when
On Friday 12 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 11:14 Tue 09 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
> I'm not really a fan of this
> but ok if I see the csn337 board patch
I meant to send that in before, thanks for the reminder.
The email I just sent has that.
If you don't like it,
On 11:14 Tue 09 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
> CSB337 boards originally shipped with MicroMonitor, not U-Boot;
> and with a version using a different convention for recording
> Ethernet addresses than anyone else. To avoid breaking Linux
> when it uses U-Boot, have it use the same convention on
CSB337 boards originally shipped with MicroMonitor, not U-Boot;
and with a version using a different convention for recording
Ethernet addresses than anyone else. To avoid breaking Linux
when it uses U-Boot, have it use the same convention on that
hardware.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell
---
cpu
15 matches
Mail list logo
