Hi Ziyuan,
On 25 July 2016 at 20:56, jk wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I'm not very familiar with other archs except, hence I'm not able to
> implement it.:-(
Well a patch for ARM would be useful. I'm sure other people could add
to it later.
Regards,
Simon
>
> Regards,
> Ziyuan Xu
>
>
> On 2016年07月26日
Hi Simon,
I'm not very familiar with other archs except, hence I'm not able to
implement it.:-(
Regards,
Ziyuan Xu
On 2016年07月26日 10:47, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 23 July 2016 at 00:31, jk wrote:
Hi guys,
I think the output of command 'dcache' is improper. It always print
'writethrough'
Hi,
On 23 July 2016 at 00:31, jk wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I think the output of command 'dcache' is improper. It always print
> 'writethrough' regardless of the real policy, such as write back.
>
> => dcache
> Data (writethrough) Cache is ON
>
> Not only ARM but also other socs support cache, hence
Hi guys,
I think the output of command 'dcache' is improper. It always print
'writethrough' regardless of the real policy, such as write back.
=> dcache
Data (writethrough) Cache is ON
Not only ARM but also other socs support cache, hence we can't
differentiate policy by macro (i.e CONFIG_SY
4 matches
Mail list logo
