On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 17:25:31 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > IIRC, HOSTCC refers to the C compiler on the and for the build host,
> > > i. e. when running on a x86 system it will create x86 code. This is
> > > obviously wrong when we try to build fw_printenv for, say
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201011101706.17988.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> based on your based comments, i'm really not surprised. you constantly
> prefer
> to ignore reality and the state of GNU toolchains. plus, you ignore other
I'm a software developer. If tool chains are broke
On 2010-11-10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Mike Frysinger,
>
> In message <201011100423.13449.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>>
>> > - use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
>> > hosted environment on the target).
>>
>> the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarant
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 06:58:51 Daniel Hobi wrote:
> On 10.11.2010 10:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday, October 11, 2010 12:06:46 Daniel Hobi wrote:
> >> - use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
> >>
> >> hosted environment on the target).
> >
> > the cross-
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 15:00:48 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > - use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
> > >
> > > hosted environment on the target).
> >
> > the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarantee that it'll
> > produce execu
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201011100423.13449.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > - use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
> > hosted environment on the target).
>
> the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarantee that it'll produce
> executables useful for
Hi Mike,
On 10.11.2010 10:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, October 11, 2010 12:06:46 Daniel Hobi wrote:
>> - use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
>> hosted environment on the target).
>
> the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarantee that it'll produce
On Monday, October 11, 2010 12:06:46 Daniel Hobi wrote:
> This patch makes tools/env/Makefile more similar to tools/imls:
> - define HOSTSRCS and HOSTCPPFLAGS, so that .depend generation works.
> - include U-Boot headers using -idirafter to prevent picking up
> u-boot/include/errno.h.
these thin
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
>> This patch makes tools/env/Makefile more similar to tools/imls:
>> - define HOSTSRCS and HOSTCPPFLAGS, so that .depend generation works.
>> - include U-Boot headers using -idirafter to prevent picking up
>> u-boot/include/
Hello Daniel,
> This patch makes tools/env/Makefile more similar to tools/imls:
> - define HOSTSRCS and HOSTCPPFLAGS, so that .depend generation works.
> - include U-Boot headers using -idirafter to prevent picking up
> u-boot/include/errno.h.
> - use HOSTCFLAGS_NOPED (fw_env.c does not conform
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:06:46 +0200
Daniel Hobi wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> In commit d984fed0 (makefiles: fixes for building build tools),
> you suggest that using $(CC) with host flags (HOSTCFLAGS, etc)
> is the correct way to use the cross compiler to generate binaries
> for a hosted environment on
This patch makes tools/env/Makefile more similar to tools/imls:
- define HOSTSRCS and HOSTCPPFLAGS, so that .depend generation works.
- include U-Boot headers using -idirafter to prevent picking up
u-boot/include/errno.h.
- use HOSTCFLAGS_NOPED (fw_env.c does not conform to -pedantic).
- use the
12 matches
Mail list logo
