2017-03-16 9:39 GMT+08:00 Simon Glass :
> Hi Eddie,
>
> On 6 March 2017 at 00:03, Eddie Cai wrote:
> > Hi Simon
> > I guess you may lost this patch. So a friendly ping.
>
> I did not lose it, but I thought I commented on it, that we needed to
> remove the duplicate code. Perhaps I imagined it sor
Hi Eddie,
On 6 March 2017 at 00:03, Eddie Cai wrote:
> Hi Simon
> I guess you may lost this patch. So a friendly ping.
I did not lose it, but I thought I commented on it, that we needed to
remove the duplicate code. Perhaps I imagined it sorry.
Anyway I have sent out an updated version (now at
Hi Simon
I guess you may lost this patch. So a friendly ping.
2017-02-23 9:59 GMT+08:00 Eddie Cai :
> Andrew F. Davis's below patch broke rk3288 based board. that is because we
> call
> spl_init in board_init_f which is at very early stage. What Andrew want to
> fix
> is calling spl_init very lat
Andrew F. Davis's below patch broke rk3288 based board. that is because we call
spl_init in board_init_f which is at very early stage. What Andrew want to fix
is calling spl_init very late. That patch will make malloc_base, limit, ptr not
initualized in spl_init when we call spl_init in board_init_
4 matches
Mail list logo