Mark Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> So how about introducing a new flag, e.g. GD_FLG_DISABLE_CONSOLE, and
> >>> use that instead? If set, it will disable both input and output, while
> >>> GD_FLG_SILENT will just dis
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> So how about introducing a new flag, e.g. GD_FLG_DISABLE_CONSOLE, and
>>> use that instead? If set, it will disable both input and output, while
>>> GD_FLG_SILENT will just disable console output.
>> Sounds much better to me
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I guess there's another side-effect from this patch which is
> > somewhat more nasty: The user can _also_ disable the debug port by
> > simply setting an environment variable. That might be a bad idea, and
> > probably not even necessary for Mark's p
Dear Haavard Skinnemoen,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> The intention is to allow boards to use a single serial port for two
> purposes: Communicating with some other device (which will get really
> confused if u-boot interferes) and as a debug port. The user/developer
> must have
4 matches
Mail list logo
