On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:07:46PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:47:33 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 03/12/2013 01:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > Hi Scott,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:47:33 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/12/2013 01:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:53 -0500, Scott Wood
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/12/2013 12:02:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2013 01:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:53 -0500, Scott Wood
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/12/2013 12:02:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/12/2013
Hi Scott,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:53 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 12:02:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > >
On 03/12/2013 12:02:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> Why would eliminating all individual callbacks cause start/end
to go
> >> away
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> Why would eliminating all individual callbacks cause start/end to go
> >> away? If that's the way the list mechanism works, t
On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Why would eliminating all individual callbacks cause start/end to go
> away? If that's the way the list mechanism works, the mechanism
> needs fixing.
Yes, that's how the mechanism works. R
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 02:59:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -000
On 03/08/2013 02:59:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries
>>> prevent the functions from bein
On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
> SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries prevent
the
> functions from being garbage-collected, even though nothing will
look at
> the list. This caused several SPL build
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
> SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries prevent the
> functions from being garbage-collected, even though nothing will look at
> the list. This caused several SPL builds (e.g. P2020RDB-PC_NAND) to
> break due to size
12 matches
Mail list logo