Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

On 3/2/2010 9:24 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > John Rigby wrote: > >> I think Ben was ok with my mx25 changes, but needed an arm person to do >> the commit. >> >> > Hi John, > > yes, I think I have read Ben's comment on your patch. However, because > your patch does not apply anymore on TOT,

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

On 3/2/2010 8:06 AM, John Rigby wrote: I think Ben was ok with my mx25 changes, but needed an arm person to do the commit. Agreed. I couldn't apply because of other patch dependencies. regards, Ben On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Wolfgang Denk > wrote: Dear Stefan

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

I'm fine with you doing the merge. On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > John Rigby wrote: > > I think Ben was ok with my mx25 changes, but needed an arm person to do > > the commit. > > > > Hi John, > > yes, I think I have read Ben's comment on your patch. However, because > y

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

John Rigby wrote: > I think Ben was ok with my mx25 changes, but needed an arm person to do > the commit. > Hi John, yes, I think I have read Ben's comment on your patch. However, because your patch does not apply anymore on TOT, I am asking who is responsible to merge the driver (you, Ben or I)

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

I think Ben was ok with my mx25 changes, but needed an arm person to do the commit. On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Stefano Babic, > > In message <4b8d2413.7070...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > As you reported, the fec_mxc.c driver needs to be merged, because at the >

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Dear Stefano Babic, In message <4b8d2413.7070...@denx.de> you wrote: > > As you reported, the fec_mxc.c driver needs to be merged, because at the > same time you add support for the MX25 and I did for the MX51. My patch > went already to the mainline, so merge is needed. > > I am asking both whic

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

John Rigby wrote: > Sorry for the double reply. This is the message I wanted to reply to. Hi John, hi Tom, > I have some i.mx25/TX25 patches. They are all prefixed with PATCH V3. > Scott already took the nand and spl patches. Ben ok'd the FEC > patches but said they needed to go in via your tr

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

2010/2/13 Paul Kline : > Detlev Zundel denx.de> writes: > >> >> Hi Stefano, >> >> > I do not know how you plan the next step, but please feel free to ask me >> > how can I help. >> >> Well, we are just packaging one of those stylish "custodian hats" which >> you will be likely to wear a lot in the

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Detlev Zundel denx.de> writes: > > Hi Stefano, > > > I do not know how you plan the next step, but please feel free to ask me > > how can I help. > > Well, we are just packaging one of those stylish "custodian hats" which > you will be likely to wear a lot in the foreseeable future and send it

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Hi Stefano, > I do not know how you plan the next step, but please feel free to ask me > how can I help. Well, we are just packaging one of those stylish "custodian hats" which you will be likely to wear a lot in the foreseeable future and send it off to you :) No honestly, as I do not see any n

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello, > Hi Wolfgang, Hi Tom, > Fred Fan, our so-far custodian for the Freescale (i.MX) ARM > architecture systems, just informed me that he cannot longer perform > this work. > > Any volunteers to help out? I have not seen up now a big race to catch this job and I would

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Magnus Lilja wrote: > Tom, > > Tom skrev: >> Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Fred Fan, our so-far custodian for the Freescale (i.MX) ARM >>> architecture systems, just informed me that he cannot longer perform >>> this work. >>> >>> Any volunteers to help out? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Tom, Tom skrev: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Fred Fan, our so-far custodian for the Freescale (i.MX) ARM >> architecture systems, just informed me that he cannot longer perform >> this work. >> >> Any volunteers to help out? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Wolfgang Denk >> > In the interim, I

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

John Rigby wrote: > Sorry for the double reply. This is the message I wanted to reply to. > > Tom, > > I have some i.mx25/TX25 patches. They are all prefixed with PATCH V3. > Scott already took the nand and spl patches. Ben ok'd the FEC > patches but said they needed to go in via your tree bec

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Sorry for the double reply. This is the message I wanted to reply to. Tom, I have some i.mx25/TX25 patches. They are all prefixed with PATCH V3. Scott already took the nand and spl patches. Ben ok'd the FEC patches but said they needed to go in via your tree because they modify i.mx files as w

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello, > > Fred Fan, our so-far custodian for the Freescale (i.MX) ARM > architecture systems, just informed me that he cannot longer perform > this work. > > Any volunteers to help out? > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > In the interim, I will fill in. If you have be

[U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed

Hello, Fred Fan, our so-far custodian for the Freescale (i.MX) ARM architecture systems, just informed me that he cannot longer perform this work. Any volunteers to help out? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich