Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello Custodians,
>
> please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
> structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
> directory structure.
Just to let you know, the fix up for my i386 patch series was trivial:
#!/bin/bash
for file
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message you
wrote:
>
> The problem with the current structure is that there is no way of
> knowing which $BOARD in board/ uses a particular CPU or SOC. Therefore
So look it up in the Makefile, or in MAKEALL - what's exactly the
problem?
> Exactly - Any code that exists und
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
>
> In message
> you wrote:
>>
>> And then there is also
>>
>> board/
>> $BOARDC
>> $BOARDD
>>
>> I've never liked code existing on multiple depths like this. Maybe we move
>> towards:
>
> But we're just about adding e
Dear Alessandro Rubini,
In message <20100416065842.ga21...@morgana.gnudd.com> you wrote:
>
> > I really like this structure, particularly if the code under
> > $VENDOR/[common, include, lib] is arch independent.
>
> Yes, that would be good, if it was a common case. However,
> arch-independent co
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message you
wrote:
>
> And then there is also
>
> board/
> $BOARDC
> $BOARDD
>
> I've never liked code existing on multiple depths like this. Maybe we move
> towards:
But we're just about adding exactly such multi-depth structures to
the CPU directory (see recent disc
Graeme,
I reply to your messages since it gives somehow more information.
I'm now not really convinced that reorganizing board directories
would be a big step forward, although I still think it would be better.
Si, I'm not arguing strongly, just bringing a point of view.
Peter, Wolfgang, I'll try
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 17:31 +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>> I can see how it'd be
>> >> nice to split up boards into CPU directories, but we'd have to discuss
>> >> some of the warts, like where vendor-specific code would
Dear Alessandro,
In message <20100415153127.ga...@morgana.gnudd.com> you wrote:
> >
> > My gut feeling is that I like the existing board/ approach better, but
> > I'm open to arguments.
>
> Here a pair of arguments...
>
> Most boards are very similar to the original evaluation kit. For
Some b
Hi Alessandro,
> > How does putting boards in their appropriate CPU directory make
> > your coding any easier?
>
> Because if all boars with the same SoC are in the same directory they
> can share source files.
But boards don't need to be in the same directory to share the same
source files.
>> Most boards are very similar to the original evaluation kit. For
>> example, [...]
>> Similarly, I'm working on a dave-tech.eu board series based on
>> ep9302-ep9315. [...]
> I don't follow either argument, or the name-switching argument...
Well, the name-switching is half a joke (but the p
Hi Alessandro,
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 17:31 +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> I can see how it'd be
> >> nice to split up boards into CPU directories, but we'd have to discuss
> >> some of the warts, like where vendor-specific code would be located if
> >> we went down that path.
> >
> > Right. I
I can see how it'd be
>> nice to split up boards into CPU directories, but we'd have to discuss
>> some of the warts, like where vendor-specific code would be located if
>> we went down that path.
>
> Right. I can see arguments pro and con each of the approaches, and I
> must admit that I have no
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message <1271343853.6519.6.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>
> A closely related topic was discussed here:
> www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg20367.html
>
> The conclusion was that grouping boards by vendor as opposed to CPU type
> made sense so that the
> > > please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
> > > structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
> > > directory structure.
> > >
> > > Please make sure to sync your repsitories ASAP.
> >
> > Do you have any plan to move board dirs to arch folder t
[cc: list trimmed as this is not that urgent any more]
Dear Michal Simek,
In message <4bc6bad2.8040...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
>
> > please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
> > structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
> > directory structure.
> >
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello Custodians,
>
> please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
> structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
> directory structure.
>
> Please make sure to sync your repsitories ASAP.
Do you have any plan to move board dirs t
Dear Remy Bohmer,
In message you
wrote:
>
> Funny...
> The wiki (http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/CustodianGitTrees) tells the
> opposite...
Ouch.
> What am I missing here?
This is somewbody else's working style, not mine.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,
Hi,
2010/4/13 Wolfgang Denk :
> Dear Ben Warren,
>
> In message <4bc4aa08.1060...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> > I do not know if there is a preferred or best way to do it, but in my
>> > case a simple git-rebase with the main branch did the job ;).
> ...
>> Thanks. I guess git-rebase would be bet
Dear Wolfgang,
On 4/13/2010 5:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello Custodians,
>
> please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
> structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
> directory structure.
>
> Please make sure to sync your repsitories ASAP.
>
> Th
Dear Ben Warren,
In message <4bc4aa08.1060...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > I do not know if there is a preferred or best way to do it, but in my
> > case a simple git-rebase with the main branch did the job ;).
...
> Thanks. I guess git-rebase would be better since that will put my net
> repo ch
Dear Ben Warren,
In message <4bc4a09d.20...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > Please make sure to sync your repsitories ASAP.
> >
> Please excuse my ignorance, but what's the best way to do this?
> git-merge with the main branch?
Yes, or - which, assuming your main branch is current, is equivale
Hi,
2010/4/13 Wolfgang Denk :
> Hello Custodians,
>
> please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
> structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
> directory structure.
>
> Please make sure to sync your repsitories ASAP.
FYI: u-boot-usb has been synched.
Hi Stefano,
On 4/13/2010 10:28 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> On 4/13/2010 2:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Custodians,
>>>
>>> please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
>>> structure" patch series. This results in
Ben Warren wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On 4/13/2010 2:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Hello Custodians,
>>
>> please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
>> structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
>> directory structure.
>>
>> Please make sure to sync
Hi Wolfgang,
On 4/13/2010 2:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello Custodians,
>
> please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
> structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
> directory structure.
>
> Please make sure to sync your repsitories ASAP.
>
>
Hello Custodians,
please note that I have applied Peter Tyser's "Reorganize directory
structure" patch series. This results in a massive change of the
directory structure.
Please make sure to sync your repsitories ASAP.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,
26 matches
Mail list logo
