Hi Marek,
On 03/20/2016 06:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/21/2016 02:45 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> Here's a more full-featured implementation of a cache for block
>> devices that uses a small linked list of cache blocks.
>
> Why do you use linked list ? You have four entries, you can as well
>
On 03/21/2016 06:56 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi!
> On 03/21/2016 09:49 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/21/2016 02:48 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>>> On 03/20/2016 06:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/21/2016 02:45 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Here's a more full-featured implementation of
Hi Marek,
On 03/21/2016 09:49 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/21/2016 02:48 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> On 03/20/2016 06:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 03/21/2016 02:45 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
Here's a more full-featured implementation of a cache for block
devices that uses a small linked
On 03/21/2016 02:48 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 03/20/2016 06:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/21/2016 02:45 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>>> Here's a more full-featured implementation of a cache for block
>>> devices that uses a small linked list of cache blocks.
>>
>> Why do you use li
On 03/21/2016 02:45 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Here's a more full-featured implementation of a cache for block devices
> that uses a small linked list of cache blocks.
Why do you use linked list ? You have four entries, you can as well use
fixed array. Maybe you should implement an adaptive cache wo
Here's a more full-featured implementation of a cache for block devices
that uses a small linked list of cache blocks.
Experimentation loading a 4.5 MiB kernel from the root directory of
a FAT filesystem shows that a single cache entry of a single block
is the only
Loading the same from the /bo
6 matches
Mail list logo
