Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/20] New 'sandbox' test architecture for U-Boot

2011-10-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, September 26, 2011 20:07:34 Simon Glass wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday, September 23, 2011 12:22:02 Simon Glass wrote: > >> This patch set points towards a possible way to improve the test > >> infrastructure in U-Boot. The goal is to have a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/20] New 'sandbox' test architecture for U-Boot

2011-09-26 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mike, On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 12:22:02 Simon Glass wrote: >> This patch set points towards a possible way to improve the test >> infrastructure in U-Boot. The goal is to have a test suite that can run in >> a minute or two on a Lin

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/20] New 'sandbox' test architecture for U-Boot

2011-09-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, September 23, 2011 12:22:02 Simon Glass wrote: > This patch set points towards a possible way to improve the test > infrastructure in U-Boot. The goal is to have a test suite that can run in > a minute or two on a Linux PC and test all non-platform code. do you have this in a public git

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/20] New 'sandbox' test architecture for U-Boot

2011-09-23 Thread Simon Glass
This patch set points towards a possible way to improve the test infrastructure in U-Boot. The goal is to have a test suite that can run in a minute or two on a Linux PC and test all non-platform code. This RFC aims to be just enough boot to U-Boot to a command prompt. You can type help; anything