Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 14/17] spl: introduce CONFIG_SPL_TARGET

2012-09-24 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/24/2012 02:03:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:54:05PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/21/2012 07:12:38 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:24PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > >> Currently it seems that SPLs rely on the user to specify the > >final target

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 14/17] spl: introduce CONFIG_SPL_TARGET

2012-09-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:54:05PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/21/2012 07:12:38 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:24PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > >> Currently it seems that SPLs rely on the user to specify the > >final target > >> on the make command line. This is a dep

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 14/17] spl: introduce CONFIG_SPL_TARGET

2012-09-24 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/21/2012 07:12:38 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:24PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Currently it seems that SPLs rely on the user to specify the final target > on the make command line. This is a departure from traditional U-Boot practice > and results in a lack of bui

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 14/17] spl: introduce CONFIG_SPL_TARGET

2012-09-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:24PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Currently it seems that SPLs rely on the user to specify the final target > on the make command line. This is a departure from traditional U-Boot > practice > and results in a lack of build coverage in MAKEALL. > > Now boards can spe

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 14/17] spl: introduce CONFIG_SPL_TARGET

2012-09-21 Thread Scott Wood
Currently it seems that SPLs rely on the user to specify the final target on the make command line. This is a departure from traditional U-Boot practice and results in a lack of build coverage in MAKEALL. Now boards can specify CONFIG_SPL_TARGET to determine what gets built by default. Eventuall