Hi Mike,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ignoring the upgrade issues, i think this is useful. only thing
> "missing" is having the pin update state externally, but maybe i'm
> crazy in thinking we need that. it certainly could be done in a
> follow up patch once your v2
ignoring the upgrade issues, i think this is useful. only thing
"missing" is having the pin update state externally, but maybe i'm
crazy in thinking we need that. it certainly could be done in a
follow up patch once your v2 of this patch gets updated, and once we
actually have a proposed interfac
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 18:54, Simon Glass wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/sandbox.c
>>
>> +#include
>> +#include
>
> not used
>
>> +#include
>
> should be asm/gpio.h
>
>> +/* These functions make up what could be
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 18:54, Simon Glass wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/sandbox.c
>
> +#include
> +#include
not used
> +#include
should be asm/gpio.h
> +/* These functions make up what could be a public interface within U-Boot */
these are the public interface in u-boot. i w
This provides a way of simulating GPIOs by setting values which are seen
by the normal gpio_get/set_value() calls.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
drivers/gpio/Makefile |1 +
drivers/gpio/sandbox.c | 213
include/sandbox_gpio.h | 50 +++
5 matches
Mail list logo