Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-04 Thread Simon Glass
On 24 January 2015 at 23:11, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > This series can be applied on the current u-boot/master > (commit 37b608a52dcb133) > > Buildman test passed. > > $ tools/buildman/buildman -s -b mach arm > boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do. > Summary of 22 commits for 474 boards (8 thr

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-04 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2015-02-02 10:18:23, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/31/2015 08:20 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >Hi Albert, > > > >On 31 January 2015 at 20:02, Albert ARIBAUD > >wrote: > >>Hello Masahiro, > >> > >>On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11:02 +0900, Masahiro Yamada > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>This series can be appl

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-03 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hello Simon, On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 09:23:05 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Albert, > [...] > > I think the ARM core name is a convenient way of splitting things up > and has served us well. But now the common elements are more at the > SOC level. Yes the idea of arch/arm/soc/mach-... is more pure f

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-02 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/31/2015 08:20 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Albert, On 31 January 2015 at 20:02, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Masahiro, On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11:02 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: This series can be applied on the current u-boot/master (commit 37b608a52dcb133) I'd rather not have all mac

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-01 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Albert, (cc Simon) On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:11:44 +0100 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Simon, > > On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:20:06 -0700, Simon Glass > wrote: > > Hi Albert, > > > > On 31 January 2015 at 20:02, Albert ARIBAUD > > wrote: > > > Hello Masahiro, > > > > > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hello Masahiro, On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11:02 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > This series can be applied on the current u-boot/master > (commit 37b608a52dcb133) I'd rather not have all mach-* directories just below arch/arm/. Can't they be created under arch/arm/soc/ instead? That would give a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Albert, On 31 January 2015 at 20:02, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Masahiro, > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11:02 +0900, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> >> This series can be applied on the current u-boot/master >> (commit 37b608a52dcb133) > > I'd rather not have all mach-* directories just below arc

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hello Simon, On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:20:06 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 31 January 2015 at 20:02, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hello Masahiro, > > > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11:02 +0900, Masahiro Yamada > > wrote: > >> > >> This series can be applied on the current u-boot/master >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-02-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Albert, On 1 February 2015 at 03:11, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Simon, > > On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:20:06 -0700, Simon Glass > wrote: >> Hi Albert, >> >> On 31 January 2015 at 20:02, Albert ARIBAUD >> wrote: >> > Hello Masahiro, >> > >> > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11:02 +0900, Masahiro Yamada

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/21] ARM: start to move SoC code into arch/arm/mach-*

2015-01-25 Thread Masahiro Yamada
This series can be applied on the current u-boot/master (commit 37b608a52dcb133) Buildman test passed. $ tools/buildman/buildman -s -b mach arm boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do. Summary of 22 commits for 474 boards (8 threads, 1 job per thread) 01: powerpc: remove icecube_5200, Lite5200,