Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-29 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 29 April 2016 at 10:30, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/29/2016 10:28 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 29 April 2016 at 10:23, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> >>> On 04/29/2016 07:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 28 April 2016 at 09:55, St

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-29 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/29/2016 10:28 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 29 April 2016 at 10:23, Stephen Warren wrote: On 04/29/2016 07:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 28 April 2016 at 09:55, Stephen Warren wrote: On 04/27/2016 10:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 26 April 2016 at 1

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-29 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 29 April 2016 at 10:23, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/29/2016 07:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 28 April 2016 at 09:55, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> >>> On 04/27/2016 10:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 26 April 2016 at 15:30, St

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-29 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/29/2016 07:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 28 April 2016 at 09:55, Stephen Warren wrote: On 04/27/2016 10:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 26 April 2016 at 15:30, Stephen Warren wrote: > It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-29 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 28 April 2016 at 10:00, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 04/27/2016 10:42 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Warren >> wrote: >>> >>> From: Stephen Warren >>> >>> It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In >>> th

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-29 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 28 April 2016 at 09:55, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/27/2016 10:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 26 April 2016 at 15:30, Stephen Warren wrote: >> > It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. >> In >> > this case, the name passed t

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-28 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/27/2016 10:42 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In this case, the name passed to device_bind() may not be unique across all devices within its ucl

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-28 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/27/2016 10:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 26 April 2016 at 15:30, Stephen Warren wrote: > It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In > this case, the name passed to device_bind() may not be unique across all > devices within its uclass. One exam

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-27 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 26 April 2016 at 15:30, Stephen Warren wrote: > It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In > this case, the name passed to device_bind() may not be unique across all > devices within its uclass. One example is a system with multiple identical > PCI E

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-27 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/26/2016 03:36 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >> On 04/26/2016 03:30 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> >>> From: Stephen Warren >>> >>> It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same >>> device. In >>> this case, the name pa

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-27 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In > this case, the name passed to device_bind() may not be unique across all > devices within its uclass. One example is a system with multipl

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-27 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/26/2016 03:36 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 04/26/2016 03:30 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In this case, the name passed to device_bind() may not be unique across all devices within its uclass. One ex

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-26 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/26/2016 03:30 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In this case, the name passed to device_bind() may not be unique across all devices within its uclass. One example is a system with multiple identical PCI E

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: ensure device names are unique

2016-04-26 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren It is possible for HW to contain multiple instances of the same device. In this case, the name passed to device_bind() may not be unique across all devices within its uclass. One example is a system with multiple identical PCI Ethernet devices. Another might be a system with