Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: device: Do not probe parents which are probed already

2019-02-05 Thread Michal Simek
On 02. 02. 19 7:05, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 03:28, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> On 31. 01. 19 11:04, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 02:41, Michal Simek > wrote: From the first look there is no reason to probe parent node

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: device: Do not probe parents which are probed already

2019-02-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Michal, On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 03:28, Michal Simek wrote: > > On 31. 01. 19 11:04, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 02:41, Michal Simek wrote: > >> > >> From the first look there is no reason to probe parent nodes if they are > >> active already. > >> > >> Sign

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: device: Do not probe parents which are probed already

2019-01-31 Thread Michal Simek
On 31. 01. 19 11:04, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 02:41, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> From the first look there is no reason to probe parent nodes if they are >> active already. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek >> --- >> >> I have created this just for showing status

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: device: Do not probe parents which are probed already

2019-01-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Michal, On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 02:41, Michal Simek wrote: > > From the first look there is no reason to probe parent nodes if they are > active already. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > --- > > I have created this just for showing status of parent device. > Maybe there is any strong reason t

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: device: Do not probe parents which are probed already

2019-01-18 Thread Michal Simek
From the first look there is no reason to probe parent nodes if they are active already. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek --- I have created this just for showing status of parent device. Maybe there is any strong reason to do this but I just wanted to check this because it looks like just wasting of