On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 11:01:19 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi!
> On 08/27/2015 10:28 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 10:13:49 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds requires the GNU
> >> variant of
Hi Marek,
On 08/27/2015 10:28 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 10:13:49 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
>> The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds requires the GNU
>> variant of date.
>
> Why does it require the GNU date ?
Cause of the -d switch. It is used in
On 08/27/2015 10:32 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 10:13 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
>> The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds requires the GNU
>> variant of date. Respect this and search it, error on missing GNU date.
>
> Well, IMHO we shouldn't chec
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 10:13:49 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds requires the GNU
> variant of date.
Why does it require the GNU date ?
> Respect this and search it, error on missing GNU date.
Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the co
The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds requires the GNU
variant of date. Respect this and search it, error on missing GNU date.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
---
This commit tries to figure out if we have a GNU date variant
available. It errors on missing GNU date when it is re
Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 10:13 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds requires the GNU
> variant of date. Respect this and search it, error on missing GNU date.
Well, IMHO we shouldn't check for GNU date but for the extensions it
implements. Thos
6 matches
Mail list logo