On 10/3/19 10:58 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Ilias,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 10:34:33AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:08:07PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
In the current implementation of FIT_SIGNATURE, five parameters for
a RSA public key are required while only two
Ilias,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 10:34:33AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:08:07PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > In the current implementation of FIT_SIGNATURE, five parameters for
> > a RSA public key are required while only two of them are essential.
> > (See rsa-m
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:08:07PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> In the current implementation of FIT_SIGNATURE, five parameters for
> a RSA public key are required while only two of them are essential.
> (See rsa-mod-exp.h and uImage.FIT/signature.txt)
> This is a result of considering relativel
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:48:05PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi AKASHI,
>
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 00:05, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
> >
> > In the current implementation of FIT_SIGNATURE, five parameters for
> > a RSA public key are required while only two of them are essential.
> > (
Hi AKASHI,
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 00:05, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> In the current implementation of FIT_SIGNATURE, five parameters for
> a RSA public key are required while only two of them are essential.
> (See rsa-mod-exp.h and uImage.FIT/signature.txt)
> This is a result of considering relativ
In the current implementation of FIT_SIGNATURE, five parameters for
a RSA public key are required while only two of them are essential.
(See rsa-mod-exp.h and uImage.FIT/signature.txt)
This is a result of considering relatively limited computer power
and resources on embedded systems, while such a
6 matches
Mail list logo