Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Two sets of experimental Kconfig patches

2014-06-24 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Tom, On Fri, 30 May 2014 13:24:08 -0400 Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:32:50PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I've posted two sets of Kconfig RFC patches: "RFCv2a" and "RFCv2b" > > These are all certainly some thought experiments worth pursuing, so > thanks

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Two sets of experimental Kconfig patches

2014-06-23 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Simon, > > I have been thinking about this a lot, but it isn't 100% clear to me. > > While I agree that duplicating the CONFIGs is bad, in fact the > opposite of what I was getting at, I do feel that things like > CONFIG_TEGRA20 need to be set in one place. We don't want the SPL/TPL > config

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Two sets of experimental Kconfig patches

2014-06-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Masahiro, On 27 May 2014 01:32, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi. > > I've posted two sets of Kconfig RFC patches: "RFCv2a" and "RFCv2b" > > The difference from v1 is that > Full U-boot image, SPL and TPL share a single defconfig > and "make config" is done in one-shot. > > This approach dates bac

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Two sets of experimental Kconfig patches

2014-05-30 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:32:50PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi. > > I've posted two sets of Kconfig RFC patches: "RFCv2a" and "RFCv2b" These are all certainly some thought experiments worth pursuing, so thanks for taking the time. > > The difference from v1 is that > Full U-boot image

[U-Boot] [RFC] Two sets of experimental Kconfig patches

2014-05-27 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi. I've posted two sets of Kconfig RFC patches: "RFCv2a" and "RFCv2b" The difference from v1 is that Full U-boot image, SPL and TPL share a single defconfig and "make config" is done in one-shot. This approach dates back to Simon's following comments: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:15:30 -0700 Simon