Hi Graeme,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Well, here we are again, a Timer API discussion :)
>
> All things considered, I don't think the Linux approach is right for U-Boot
> - It is designed to cater for way more use-cases than U-Boot will ever need
> to deal w
On 9/16/2011 4:53 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Well, here we are again, a Timer API discussion
>
> All things considered, I don't think the Linux approach is right for
U-Boot
> - It is designed to cater for way more use-cases than U-Boot will
ever need
> to deal with (time queues a
Hi All,
Well, here we are again, a Timer API discussion :)
All things considered, I don't think the Linux approach is right for U-Boot
- It is designed to cater for way more use-cases than U-Boot will ever need
to deal with (time queues and call-backs in particular)
To summarise, in a nutshell,
3 matches
Mail list logo