Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Proposal on changing raw boot mode

2016-10-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 08:07:24PM +0300, Sam Protsenko wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'd like to make two changes on how raw MMC address and size of U-Boot > are represented. But I think it's better to discuss it first, so we > are on the same page about it. > > Basically I want to review two config opt

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Proposal on changing raw boot mode

2016-10-21 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi, On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:07:24 +0300 Sam Protsenko semen.protse...@linaro.org wrote: ... > 1. CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS > > Simple grep shows us that noone actually uses this constant > (despite it's being defined for multiple boards). So I'm thinking to > remove it altogether. Wha

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Proposal on changing raw boot mode

2016-10-21 Thread Alexander Graf
On 20/10/2016 19:07, Sam Protsenko wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'd like to make two changes on how raw MMC address and size of U-Boot > are represented. But I think it's better to discuss it first, so we > are on the same page about it. > > Basically I want to review two config options here. > > 1.

[U-Boot] [RFC] Proposal on changing raw boot mode

2016-10-20 Thread Sam Protsenko
Hi guys, I'd like to make two changes on how raw MMC address and size of U-Boot are represented. But I think it's better to discuss it first, so we are on the same page about it. Basically I want to review two config options here. 1. CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS Simple grep shows us t