Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-28 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Graeme Russ wrote on 2010/03/28 09:38:47: > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > Graeme Russ wrote on 2010/03/27 12:54:03: > >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >>> I did a few months ago for MPC83xx and sent it to the list. There was some > >>> discussion but in the end it wasn't applied because it was to

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-28 Thread Graeme Russ
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Graeme Russ wrote on 2010/03/27 12:54:03: >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> I did a few months ago for MPC83xx and sent it to the list. There was some >>> discussion but in the end it wasn't applied because it was too invasive. >>> PPC is especially bad as it needs to rel

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-27 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Graeme Russ wrote on 2010/03/27 12:54:03: > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >> In the near future, I intend to make it 100% relocatable (i.e. does not > >> need to be loaded at TEXT_BASE) and maybe even add the ability to specify > >> the relocation address. > > > > I did a few months ago for MPC83x

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-27 Thread Graeme Russ
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> In the near future, I intend to make it 100% relocatable (i.e. does not >> need to be loaded at TEXT_BASE) and maybe even add the ability to specify >> the relocation address. > > I did a few months ago for MPC83xx and sent it to the list. There was some > discussion but

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-27 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > In the near future, I intend to make it 100% relocatable (i.e. does not > need to be loaded at TEXT_BASE) and maybe even add the ability to specify > the relocation address. I did a few months ago for MPC83xx and sent it to the list. There was some discussion but in the end it wasn't applied b

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-26 Thread Graeme Russ
Peter Tyser wrote: > < snip> > >> Once this patchset is applied I believe the x86 port of U-Boot will be >> ready for more mainstream use >> >> Wolfgang - If there is any other renewed interest in the x86 port, I would >> be more than happy to be an official custodian > > Hi Graeme, > Is there a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-26 Thread Peter Tyser
< snip> > Once this patchset is applied I believe the x86 port of U-Boot will be > ready for more mainstream use > > Wolfgang - If there is any other renewed interest in the x86 port, I would > be more than happy to be an official custodian Hi Graeme, Is there a quick summary about what is suppo

[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 00/21] [x86] 'Comming of Age'

2010-03-25 Thread Graeme Russ
Hello Everyone It has been a while since I posted to the U-Boot list, but I have not been idle. This patch series represents a 'comming of age' for the x86 U-Boot port. I can now boot a Linux 2.6.33 kernel *very happy hacker* I've spent a lot of effort organising and cleaning up this patch series